[OGSA-AUTHZ] Next Telecon

[Tom Scavo]

Hi Joni,

On 10/31/06, Joni Hahkala <joni.hahkala at cern.ch> wrote:
>
> But if you mean bringing this to the current VOMS system, that might be
> a harder sell, as the explicit primary would probably mean a change in
> the VOMS AC extension format, VOMS parsers and maybe in VOMS api and in
> the software that uses VOMS.

No, I wasn't suggesting that VOMS be modified, but I would recommend
that any mapping of VOMS ACs to SAML attribute assertions incorporate
the notion of "primary" VO membership attribute.  There is precedence
for this in the SAML world, which is all I was trying to communicate
previously.

Cheers,
Tom