[OGSA-AUTHZ] Q on document status

[Von Welch]

On Aug 16, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Olle Mulmo wrote:

>
> Ahaaa... that explains things. Actually, an author can submit a  
> document to
> the Editor pipeline him/herself ("Submit GGF draft" in the Editor  
> project at
> GridForge). But if you want to, I can take care of that for you.

Ah, I think Dane did it for the attributes document. I can take care  
of it.
>
> Would it make sense to "upgrade" the OGSI technology references in the
> requirements document and instead refer to the current OGSA base  
> profile
> technology (WSRF/WSN) before progressing the document? Basically  
> it's just a
> question of word replacements, as I see it the requirements are the  
> same.
> That would make the document "current" and "hot" and "useful" and  
> be time
> well spent: I see little value in using the publishing process as an
> archival service.

Here's the original, is that what you mean?

https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-authz/document/ 
OGSA_Authorization_Requirements/en/1

Von

>
> /Olle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Von Welch [mailto:vwelch at ncsa.uiuc.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:50 PM
> To: Olle Mulmo
> Cc: ogsa-authz at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [OGSA-AUTHZ] Q on document status
>
>
> Olle,
>
>   I thought the Authorization service document was in your/Dane's
> hands to pass to the editor. Maybe I am misremembering the process
> and I'm supposed to submit it? In any case there is the requested
> tweak from the OGSA-WG from my email yesterday now, so maybe its best
> it hasn't progressed.
>
>   The requirements document is actually the following document, which
> is an informational document that was created when we split the authz
> svc and atribbutes documents. It should progress as well.
>
> https://forge.gridforum.org/docman2/ViewCategory.php?
> group_id=119&category_id=449
>
> The attributes document is in public comment:
>
>>
>> The OGSA Attributes document is now in public comment so people are
>> encouraged to read and comment on that as well.
>> http://www.ggf.org/Public_Comment_Docs/Documents/July-2005/draft-
>> ggf-OGSA-authorization-attributes-june-05.pdf
>>
>
> Von
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2005, at 4:39 AM, Olle Mulmo wrote:
>
>
>> With a 2-year celebration of this WG and the recent recharter, I
>> would like to look back and see that we haven't left too much
>> unfinished business behind, or that something is not forgotten.
>> Could you please comment on current document status for this WG?
>>
>> I noticed that the attributes document refers to the "OGSA
>> Authorization Requirements" doc. I guess that should read GFD.38
>> (the work done by authz-wg)?
>>
>> In addition, from what I can tell the first version of the SAML
>> callout spec haven't hit the editor yet. I had the impression that
>> was about to happen "any day now" -- or are you skipping this and
>> shooting for the SAMLv2 version of the document immediately?
>>
>> Cleaning-ladily yours,
>>
>> /Olle
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>