[ogf20pc] Today's telcon

[Dave Berry]

Hi Erwin,

There are fewer than 48 proposals, as some proposals requested more than
one session.  

I realise that we won't be able to consider every proposal in detail but
I would like to briefly consider each one, seeing in which track they
would best fit.  I agree that a more detailed consideration will have to
take place off-line.

I would also like to see whether we want to respond to some proposers
with alternative possibilities.  E.g. for some, we might ask whether
they would consider running in fewer sessions.  For others, we might
suggest they are more appropriate as group sessions, or that they give a
presentation in the Grids Mean Business track instead of running in a
separate session.

Best wishes,

Dave.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erwin Laure [mailto:Erwin.Laure at cern.ch] 
> Sent: 13 February 2007 14:47
> To: Dave Berry
> Cc: ogf20pc at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Today's telcon
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Do you really want to do that online in the phone conference? Going 
> online through all the 48 proposals will probably not be very 
> efficient. 
> Also, I doubt many of us had the chance to carefully look 
> into them (at 
> least, I wasn't able to do so, yet).
> 
> May I propose to do an off-line ranking according to your 
> suggestion in 
> the coming days (say until Friday) and then discuss the 
> ranked results 
> in the PC meeting?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- Erwin
> 
> Dave Berry wrote:
> > A reminder that we have a telcon today, at 9am PST / 11am 
> CST / 12am EST 
> > / 5pm GMT / 6pm CET / 2am JST / 3am Sydney.
> >  
> > I want to go through the community proposals.  For each proposal, I 
> > suggest we first decide whether it falls under the remit of 
> e-Science, 
> > Enterprise, or other.  Then I'd like to rate each proposal from 1-5 
> > according to the scale below, ignoring whether we can schedule the 
> > event.  We should also decide whether the content could be 
> suitable for 
> > another type of sessions, e.g. a Group Session, Grid Means 
> Business, or 
> > the Developer track.
> >  
> > When rating proposals, we should consider the relevance to 
> Grid, the 
> > international scope, the quality of the content and the 
> relevance to OGF.
> >  
> > Ratings:
> > 1 - Not suitable for OGF.
> > 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be 
> > included if we need to fill slots.
> > 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; 
> to be included 
> > if slots is available.
> > 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be 
> included if possible.
> > 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what
> >  
> > The dialin details are as before:
> > International dialin: +44 145 254 2309
> > USA Freephone: 1 866 838 0046
> > UK number: 0845 245 0224
> > Australia Freephone: 180 010 9603
> > 
> > Passcode: 275359
> > 
> > Dave Berry
> > Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
> > National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
> > Edinburgh, EH8 9AA                  +44 131 651 4039
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ogf20pc mailing list
> > ogf20pc at ogf.org
> > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
>