[occi-wg] XML to describe instances

[Augusto Ciuffoletti]

Yes, there is a "resourceType" that inherits from "entityType", that
explains that an entity has a kind associated and has attributes and mixins
etc. What I miss is a unified view of all (possible) representations, that
binds JSON and XML for instance: the master of all. And also the statement
of the relationship between a "resource" instance, and the related "kind"
instance. Attributes are obviously the same, but this is not stated clearly
(and cannot be in XML). Resources and kinds live in distinct worlds, but
are defined in the same file.

Luckily the JSON rendering is on the final track now, and this should help.

Bye

Augusto

PS: parser and renderer, sure. This was the reason why I tried to submit a
JSON description. I will continue from that point, probably next week...


2014/1/25 Jean Parpaillon <jean.parpaillon at free.fr>

> Hi Augusto,
>
> Le vendredi 24 janvier 2014 à 21:31 +0100, Augusto Ciuffoletti a écrit :
> > Time ago someone proposed to use XML as a tool to describe OCCI. As a
> > result we now have the XML description of high order concepts (kinds),
> > and an XSD that binds the way in which such higher order concepts are
> > described. This is certainly a result.
> >
> >
> > But XML might be useful also to describe low order concepts, i.e.
> > resources, which is a different (though tightly related) issue. We
> > have an example today in the "erocci" discussion. The fact of having a
> > clean higher order description based on XML/XSD wired in the engine
> > does not help us in clarifying an otherwise straightforward detail
> > about the way resources are described. This is because the JSON
> > rendering is certainly useful for practical reasons,  but there is no
> > XSD for JSON (at least to my knowledge).
> >
>
> It exists some JSON schema (http://json-schema.org/ ) with, if I
> undestand correctly, some validators and parsers, but I've never used
> them. I suppose the JSON spec should include a schema of the kind.
>
> >
> > My idea is that having an XSD also for resources (that describes the
> > syntax for resources, not for kinds) would be beneficial: it can be
> > probably derived from the JSON document, but once defined it can be
> > used to automate the validation of XML resource descriptions, and for
> > all those descriptive languages for which an XML mapping exists (JSON
> > included).
> >
>
> I have not emaphasized on that yet, but the occi.xsd schema contains
> also description of resources and kinds. Nevertheless, it is not yet
> implemented completly in erocci, as I'm focusing on JSON rendering
> first. Any comments welcome.
> For the contributions ;) , just have a look at occi_parser_xml.erl and
> occi_renderer_xml.erl
>
> Cheers,
> Jean
>
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > --
> > Augusto Ciuffoletti
> > Dipartimento di Informatica
> > Università di Pisa
> > 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
> > _______________________________________________
> > occi-wg mailing list
> > occi-wg at ogf.org
> > https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
> --
> Jean Parpaillon
> Open Source Consultant
> Phone: +33 6 30 10 92 86
> im: jean.parpaillon at gmail.com
> skype: jean.parpaillon
> linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeanparpaillon/en
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>



-- 
Augusto Ciuffoletti
Dipartimento di Informatica
Università di Pisa
56100 - Pisa (Italy)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20140127/97015fc5/attachment.html>