[occi-wg] document update

[Andre Merzky]

Hi guys,

OGF is still waiting on the revision of the document before it can go
into publication.  I guess summer break does not go nicely with boring
document work :)  Nevertheless, please don't let the document linger
much longer...

While I am on it, I would like to remind the OCCI group that OGF-42 is
planned in London in early September [1], where a couple of topics are
specifically depending on input from OCCI.  Like, the DRMAA folx would
like to finalize the OCCI bindings which are in limbo for quite a
number of months, due to rather small unresolved items (such as how to
render pagination).  So please consider to show up to that event!

Thanks, Andre.

[1]  https://www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/events/ogf-42

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Augusto Ciuffoletti
<augusto at di.unipi.it> wrote:
> Here it is: that's to have a better document, not a different one.
>
> Here is the list of the fixes I propose:
> line 50: complimentary -> complementary
> line 83: "Thus messages can be delivered by e.g." -> "For instance messages
> can be delivered by using"
> line 88/89: "on the OCCI Core instances OCCI Kind, OCCI Mixin..." -> "on the
> OCCI Core instances, namely OCCI Kind, OCCI Mixin..."
> line 89: "include" -> "includes"
> line 90: "identified by OCCI Actions" -> "identified by an OCCI Action"
> line 93: "Attribute names consist of alphanumeric characters separated by
> dots. The dots define a namespace hierarchy" -> "Attribute names consist of
> alphanumeric *strings* separated by dots that define a namespace hierarchy"
> line 94: remove "as shown in the following example"
> line 105: replace "as shown in the following example" with ": Table 1
> defines the object members" from line 106. The result is:
> == cut here ==
> The OCCI Resource Instance Format consists of a JSON object: Table 1 defines
> the object members. Section 5.1 contains a detailed example
> == cut here ==
> line 120: same as line 105
> line 139: same as line 105
> line 146: same as line 105
> line 162: same as line 105
> line 179; same as line 105
>
> I mean that none of them has a normative impact: otherwise this is probably
> due to my misunderstanding.
>
> Bye
>
> Augusto
>
>
> 2014-06-19 16:45 GMT+02:00 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>:
>
>> I guarantee no normative proposals :-) (not by me, at least).
>>
>> There are several typos around, and the "by example" approach is not
>> entirely satisfactory to me. Nothing to do with the normative content,
>> again.
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-19 16:22 GMT+02:00 Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>:
>>
>>> Dear Augusto,
>>>
>>> the document is certainly still open for editorial comments.  What
>>> *normative* changes are accepted though is up to the group and authors
>>> to decide -- but significant normative changes would call for another
>>> round of public comments, so there is a procedural barrier here.
>>> Anyway, if that is needed, then better now than later... :)
>>>
>>> HtH, Andre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Augusto Ciuffoletti
>>> <augusto at di.unipi.it> wrote:
>>> > Hi Andre,
>>> >
>>> > I'm browsing that paper right now, since I'd like to use the JSON for
>>> > my
>>> > purpose. Can I suggest minor fixes, or the doc is substantially closed
>>> > and
>>> > just for approval?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2014-06-16 11:18 GMT+02:00 Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>:
>>> >>
>>> >> Dear OCCI-WG,
>>> >>
>>> >> please remember that the JSON Rendering document is in your court for
>>> >> iteration.  It probably would make sense to close this one before
>>> >> people disappear into the summer breaks? :)
>>> >>
>>> >> See http://redmine.ogf.org/issues/96 for details.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best, Andre.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> It was a sad and disappointing day when I discovered that my Universal
>>> >> Remote Control did not, in fact, control the Universe.  (Not even
>>> >> remotely.)
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> occi-wg mailing list
>>> >> occi-wg at ogf.org
>>> >> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Augusto Ciuffoletti
>>> > Dipartimento di Informatica
>>> > Università di Pisa
>>> > 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> It was a sad and disappointing day when I discovered that my Universal
>>> Remote Control did not, in fact, control the Universe.  (Not even
>>> remotely.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> Dipartimento di Informatica
>> Università di Pisa
>> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)



-- 
It was a sad and disappointing day when I discovered that my Universal
Remote Control did not, in fact, control the Universe.  (Not even
remotely.)