[occi-wg] Update on work register to be given at DMTF CMWG meeting tomorrow

[Ilja Livenson]

Hi, Alan

stumbled on your mail, not sure if it's still valid, but basically the
answer is yes - CDMI ideology allows to export certain contains
through other protocols - SRM can be one of those.
>From the other side, SRM could be used to resolve a certain logical
name to CDMI URL.

cheers,
Ilja

On 6 October 2011 22:16, Alan Sill <alan.sill at ttu.edu> wrote:
> Thanks for the update - I knew about the move, so just let me know when it is effective.
>
> As for the protocol discussion below, it looks like a good topic for the interoperability group -- there are certainly more protocols than that!
>
> One question I have is whether SRM can be integrated with CDMI, as both support straight URI-based transfers?
>
> Alan
>
>
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 12:20 PM, florian.feldhaus at tu-dortmund.de wrote:
>
>> The slides look good. In the next weeks we (currently TU Dortmund, but
>> changing to GWDG Göttingen), would like to discuss section "13 Exported
>> Protocols" of the CDMI specification [1] to improve the OCCI and NFS parts.
>>
>> Besides that we work together with Ilja Stevenson from Venus-C to bring a
>> live demo online showing how OCCI and CDMI nicely fit together.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Florian
>>
>> [1]
>> http://cdmi.sniacloud.com/CDMI_Spec/13-Exported_Protocols/13-Exported_Proto
>> cols.htm
>>
>> Am 06.10.11 16:14 schrieb "Alan Sill" unter <alan.sill at ttu.edu>:
>>
>>> Thanks, folks; updates made as below and corrections as indicated, and
>>> new version posted.
>>>
>>> http://www.hpcc.ttu.edu/asill/cloud-standards/DMTF-OGF-CMWG-Update.pdf
>>>
>>> I also added a new slide "Other work and publications" just before the
>>> summary.
>>>
>>> If people feel there are explicit things we should say about future
>>> possible mapping work or coordination, please let me know.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2011, at 3:58 AM, Edmonds, AndrewX wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just one minor correction to slide 5. Rather than saying "OCCI v1.1
>>>> Architecture" it would be better to say "Open Nebula OCCI v1.1
>>>> Architecture". Otherwise the thing that most closely represents the OCCI
>>>> architecture would be [1].
>>>>
>>>> Also on the OCCI/CDMI/OVF integration that was described in the
>>>> infoq.com
>>>> article, it is good to say that 2/3 of the scenario is implemented by
>>>> what
>>>> Florian has been working on.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://occi-wg.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/occi-intro.png
>>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2011, at 3:23 AM, David Snelling wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alan,
>>>>
>>>> Looks good, just one thing caught my eye.
>>>>
>>>> - Slide 4 is an update from SIENA meeting, which I guess the DMTF Folks
>>>> will not have attended.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> occi-wg mailing list
>>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> occi-wg mailing list
>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>