[occi-wg] Fwd: NIST Reference Architecture sub-teams proposal

[Alan Sill]

Dear OCCI and OGSA folks,

Please see the message below.  Do we have a reference architecture, either for OCCI or OGSA web services, to propose for inclusion into the list of reference architectures being gathered by NIST?

Please see the overall NIST working group pages at http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/  for context.  

Thanks,
Alan

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Hung Nguyen <Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov>
> Date: January 19, 2011 7:43:24 AM CST
> To: "matt.metheny at 1ecg.com" <matt.metheny at 1ecg.com>, "Dean.C.LandisII at aexp.com" <Dean.C.LandisII at aexp.com>, "Brian.Hughes at ca.com" <Brian.Hughes at ca.com>, "Paul.Lipton at ca.com" <Paul.Lipton at ca.com>, "bob.linehan at coremax.com" <bob.linehan at coremax.com>, "micheledrgon at dataprobity.com" <micheledrgon at dataprobity.com>, "thomas.wood at db.com" <thomas.wood at db.com>, "David.Kye at disa.mil" <David.Kye at disa.mil>, "eugene.luster1 at gmail.com" <eugene.luster1 at gmail.com>, "i.polyzos at gmail.com" <i.polyzos at gmail.com>, "jim.marino at gmail.com" <jim.marino at gmail.com>, "ken_j_roberts at hotmail.com" <ken_j_roberts at hotmail.com>, "andrey.vakulenko at hp.com" <andrey.vakulenko at hp.com>, "babakj at microsoft.com" <babakj at microsoft.com>, Gregg Brown <greggb at microsoft.com>, Hung Nguyen <Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov>, "jeremy.forman at oracle.com" <jeremy.forman at oracle.com>, "f.devaulx at prometheuscomputing.com" <f.devaulx at prometheuscomputing.com>, "ASankar at springcm.com" <ASankar at springcm.com>, "medwards at tmforum.org" <medwards at tmforum.org>, "Sill, Alan" <alan.sill at ttu.edu>, "katherine.s.goodier at ugov.gov" <katherine.s.goodier at ugov.gov>, "chrisfer at us.ibm.com" <chrisfer at us.ibm.com>, "swamchan at us.ibm.com" <swamchan at us.ibm.com>, "Nancy.Landreville at va.gov" <Nancy.Landreville at va.gov>, "cknowles at vmware.com" <cknowles at vmware.com>, "aha at zuehlke.com" <aha at zuehlke.com>
> Cc: "Robert B. Bohn" <robert.bohn at nist.gov>
> Subject: Reference Architecture sub-teams proposal
> 
> Dear Reference Architecture team members,
> 
> 
> On behalf of Bob Bohn and the NIST team, Gregg Brown and I would like to extend our welcomes to each and everyone of you.  Thank you very much for volunteering to participate in the Reference Architecture analysis group. 
> 
> As you may be already aware, our task is to review the prepared document that was published to the NIST's twiki.  Please follow this link to the document --> http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/pub/CloudComputing/ReferenceArchitectureTaxonomy/NIST_CCRATWG_004_ExistentReferenceModels_010311.pdf
> 
> There are nine reference architectures listed in the document, and there may be others which weren't listed.  Of the nine reference architectures, Gregg suggested that these architectures be organized into five different themes.  We would like to suggest for each member to pick a functional characteristic or utility to work on.  Additionally, each theme will need a leader.  Please let Gregg and I know of your intention.
> 
> 1.)    RAs that incorporate the NIST service model
> ·         2.) Cloud Computing Use Cases
> ·         3.) IBM Cloud Reference
> ·         4.) CSA Cloud reference Model
> ·         7.) GSA Federal Cloud Computing Initiative
> 2.)    RAs that use software stacks
> ·         2.) Cloud Computing Use Cases
> ·         4.) CSA Cloud reference Model
> 3.)    RAs that focus on functional capabilities
> ·         1.) DMTF Cloud Service Reference Architecture
> ·         4.) CSA Cloud reference Model
> ·         6.) Open Security Alliance Secure Reference Models
> ·         7.) GSA Federal Cloud Computing Initiative
> 4.)    High technical abstraction
> ·         5.) Cisco Cloud Reference Architecture Model
> ·         9.) Elastra: A Cloud technology Reference Model  for Enterprise Clouds
> 5.)    RAs with user roles as a focus
> ·         3.) IBM Cloud Reference
> ·         6.) Open Security Alliance Secure Reference Models
> 
> A tight deadline has been published by the NIST team.  There will be a lot of work in-front of us.
> 
> 
> Below is a list of volunteered.  In a next day or two, Gregg and I would like to have the sub-teams in-placed and ready to conduct analyses of the existence architectures.
> Brian.Hughes at ca.com
> 
> katherine.s.goodier at ugov.gov
> 
> babakj at microsoft.com
> 
> David.Kye at disa.mil
> 
> bob.linehan at coremax.com
> 
> thomas.wood at db.com
> 
> ken_j_roberts at hotmail.com
> 
> ASankar at springcm.com
> 
> medwards at tmforum.org
> 
> aha at zuehlke.com
> 
> jim.marino at gmail.com
> 
> f.devaulx at prometheuscomputing.com
> 
> Nancy.Landreville at va.gov
> 
> andrey.vakulenko at hp.com
> 
> micheledrgon at dataprobity.com
> 
> jeremy.forman at oracle.com
> 
> cknowles at vmware.com
> 
> swamchan at us.ibm.com
> 
> Dean.C.LandisII at aexp.com
> 
> matt.metheny at 1ecg.com
> 
> i.polyzos at gmail.com
> 
> chrisfer at us.ibm.com
> 
> Paul.Lipton at ca.com
> 
> eugene.luster1 at gmail.com
> 
> alan.sill at ttu.edu
> 
> greggb at microsoft.com
> 
> Hung.nguyen at nara.gov
> 
> Once again, thank you.
> 
> Hung and Gregg.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20110119/3443188b/attachment-0001.html