[occi-wg] Renaming the "Link" base type

[alexander.papaspyrou at tu-dortmund.de]

I'd vote for keeping "Link". Core should be clean, and not tailored to some naming in the renderings. I know that, for HTTP, certain things are fix, but I don't see such a danger for confusions, anyway.

-Alexander

Am 06.10.2010 um 16:33 schrieb Ralf Nyren:

> Hi,
> 
> It is easy to confuse the OCCI "Link" base type with HTTP "Link Header"  
> and the general term of linking.
> 
> Therefore it was proposed during today's conf call to rename the base type  
> "Link" to "ResourceLink". That way we let the name make clear what the  
> Link is used for, i.e. linking Resources.
> 
> Would appreciate your comments. Deadline is on Friday.
> 
> regards, Ralf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4678 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20101006/da10df01/attachment.bin