[occi-wg] Editorial tool

[Michael Behrens]

+1 google docs.
I like the ability to collaborate on-line.  We can always convert later 
to another format if needed.

Alexis Richardson wrote:
> +1 for google docs.
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Andre Merzky<andre at merzky.net>  wrote:
>    
>> Quoting [Thijs Metsch] (Jul 01 2010):
>>      
>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 03:37:22 -0400
>>> From: "Thijs Metsch"<tmetsch at platform.com>
>>> To:<occi-wg at ogf.org>
>>> Subject: [occi-wg] Editorial tool
>>>
>>> Hi @all,
>>>
>>> Since DocBook hasn't turned out to be the best tool for editing our
>>> specs I wanted to bring up the discussion on how the following revision
>>> should be edited. I guess we have several options - and feel free to add
>>> more:
>>>
>>> * Word/OpenOffice
>>> Pro: Ease of use (Templates available)
>>> Contra: Merging and version control
>>>
>>> * Latex
>>> Pro: Merging, version control easy (Andre could help with templates)
>>> Contra: Not so easy to use
>>>
>>> * Plain TXT files in Wiki -->  then use a tool for formatting when
>>> finished...
>>> Pro: Easy editable
>>> Contra: Not so cool for graphics etc. (formatting)
>>>        
>> Google docs is another option I guess, although you cannot use the
>> GF accounts that way.
>>
>> Best, Andre.
>>
>>
>>      
>>> Feel free to add more and state you preference - It would be cool if in
>>> future a lot of people can help edit the specs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> -Thijs
>>>        
>> --
>> Nothing is ever easy.
>> _______________________________________________
>> occi-wg mailing list
>> occi-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
>    


-- 
Michael Behrens
R2AD, LLC
(571) 594-3008 (cell)
(703) 714-0442 (land)