[occi-wg] Editorial tool

Alexis Richardson alexis at rabbitmq.com
Thu Jul 1 07:24:34 CDT 2010


+1 for google docs.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:
> Quoting [Thijs Metsch] (Jul 01 2010):
>> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 03:37:22 -0400
>> From: "Thijs Metsch" <tmetsch at platform.com>
>> To: <occi-wg at ogf.org>
>> Subject: [occi-wg] Editorial tool
>>
>> Hi @all,
>>
>> Since DocBook hasn't turned out to be the best tool for editing our
>> specs I wanted to bring up the discussion on how the following revision
>> should be edited. I guess we have several options - and feel free to add
>> more:
>>
>> * Word/OpenOffice
>> Pro: Ease of use (Templates available)
>> Contra: Merging and version control
>>
>> * Latex
>> Pro: Merging, version control easy (Andre could help with templates)
>> Contra: Not so easy to use
>>
>> * Plain TXT files in Wiki --> then use a tool for formatting when
>> finished...
>> Pro: Easy editable
>> Contra: Not so cool for graphics etc. (formatting)
>
> Google docs is another option I guess, although you cannot use the
> GF accounts that way.
>
> Best, Andre.
>
>
>> Feel free to add more and state you preference - It would be cool if in
>> future a lot of people can help edit the specs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Thijs
>
> --
> Nothing is ever easy.
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>



More information about the occi-wg mailing list