[occi-wg] Deadline for consensus

[Roger Menday]

Hi Sam,

not to undervalue your hard work, but in my opinion I don't think we  
will be able to make a decision this week. We don't have all the time  
in the world, but I don't fancy rushing a decision on this one.

regards,
Roger

> All,
>
> As you know our already extended deadline for the formats discussion  
> passed on Friday. Thijs is now in the unfortunate position of having  
> to explain why we will miss our first self-assigned deliverable  
> deadline (an implementable draft) on Thursday and I know well how it  
> feels to have to stand in front of an audience with nothing to say,  
> having done so twice last week (it's only with a big "personal  
> vision only" disclaimer that I was able to say anything at the Cloud  
> Computing Expos).
>
> Iff we can come to consensus about the format today (or at the very  
> latest tomorrow) then we need not watch another deadline sail by and  
> in doing so risk being declared a failure prematurely. Indeed if we  
> can't achieve even a loose consensus after all the discussion then I  
> may well be the first to say so - my time (and travel!) budget for  
> OCCI has already been well exceeded and the irrelevant RF vs RAND  
> discussion has tested what's left of my patience. Please focus on  
> the task at hand and if you have any specific issues about the  
> latest proposal then raise them sooner rather than later - I've put  
> considerable effort into optimising Atom out for the most common use  
> case (individual resources) over the weekend and by shifting  
> metadata to HTTP headers the resulting descriptor format is far  
> simpler than even I would have thought possible - see APIDesign for  
> examples.
>
> On the subject of rolling our own protocol from scratch, I for one  
> am dismissing the suggestion for reasons previously explained. I  
> don't think this group has (nor needs) what it takes to implement an  
> Internet protocol from the ground up and any attempt to do so would  
> be fraught with danger, not to mention completely unnecessary given  
> the corpus of work done by others at the IETF (who are geared up for  
> such tasks).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg


Roger Menday (PhD)
<roger.menday at uk.fujitsu.com>

Senior Researcher, Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE, U.K.
Tel: +44 (0) 208 606 4534



______________________________________________________________________
                                        
 Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
 Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
 Registered No. 4153469
 
 This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
 may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
 use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
 e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan and McAfee Groupshield does
 not guarantee that it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is
 virus-free. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20090526/eadb9fb2/attachment.html