[occi-wg] Events ?

[Alexis Richardson]

Indeed and XMPP and HTTP should not be overlooked either.


On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Sam Johnston <samj at samj.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Alexis Richardson
> <alexis.richardson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting point.
>>
>> Speaking as someone who is professionally involved in messaging and
>> events my STRONG advice would be to completely leave them for now.
>> Implementation of the planned draft will naturally bring up use cases
>> suited to the various eventing technologies and protocols, none of
>> which are fully baked by the way.  This will be good fodder for future
>> work but currently is **** not in scope ****.
>
> Agreed, and I don't know AMQP well enough to say how it could fit here.
>
> The use case we need to take away from it is that OCCI messages aren't
> necessarily going to be ephemeral - they may well be long lived, queued,
> serialised, saved to file, etc.
>
> Sam
>
>