[occi-wg] Syntax of OCCI API

[Chris Webb]

Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> writes:

> Quoting [Alexis Richardson] (Apr 16 2009):
> > Is it your view that:
> > 
> > 1. These should NOT be described in the API
> > 2. These should be described but in a 'non core' section of the API
> 
> 3. these would be described in the API (core or non-core)
> but would be marked 'Optional' (*)  
> 
> (*) implementations would still be standard compliant if
> they do not provide these optional methods, and flag a
> respecitve error when these get called.

Personally I think (3) is the natural thing to do too.

Best wishes,

Chris.