[Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment

[Guy Roberts]

Hello Takefusa-san,

Thanks for spotting this problem.

I have corrected the problem here:  https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424?download=21640

I will add this correction to the published version.

Regards,
Guy

From: Atsuko Takefusa [mailto:takefusa at nii.ac.jp]
Sent: 08 July 2016 03:13
To: Guy Roberts
Cc: Chin Guok; Greg Newby (newby at arsc.edu); Jens Jensen; Richard Hughes-Jones; nsi-wg at ogf.org; Alan Sill (alan.sill at ttu.edu)
Subject: Re: [Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment


Hi all,

In my environment, I can see some garbage characters
in Fig 1 and Fig 4 as I attached.
They seem to include local characters.
Could you check on them?

Thanks!

Atsuko


Atsuko Takefusa, Ph. D.
National Institute of Informatics

[cid:image001.png at 01D1E66F.B2C617A0][cid:image002.png at 01D1E66F.B2C617A0]



2016/07/04 18:49、Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts at geant.org<mailto:Guy.Roberts at geant.org>> のメール：

Hello All

Thanks Chin and John for this.  I have cleaned this up, i.e. removed comments and updated fields and dates.

This is now v7 and is available here for upload for public comment:https://redmine.ogf.org/issues/284

Guy

From: Chin Guok [mailto:chin at es.net]
Sent: 02 July 2016 17:41
To: Guy Roberts
Cc: nsi-wg at ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg at ogf.org>; Greg Newby (newby at arsc.edu<mailto:newby at arsc.edu>); Jens Jensen; Richard Hughes-Jones; Alan Sill (alan.sill at ttu.edu<mailto:alan.sill at ttu.edu>)
Subject: Re: [Nsi-wg] NSI AA document ready to go to public comment

Hi all,

Both John and I made a pass to address all the outstanding comments.  We believe this is ready for final review and public comment if the clarification to the comments are satisfactory.

The updated document can be found on Redmine:
https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13536

Thanks!

- Chin

Chin Guok                                                             NOC:  (510) 486-7600
Network Engineer                                                            (800) 333-7638
ESnet Network Engineering Group (AS293)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Guy Roberts <Guy.Roberts at geant.org<mailto:Guy.Roberts at geant.org>> wrote:
Hello All,

Thanks to Richard for his second review of the NSI AA document (as well as the review from Jens).  We will address the outstanding issues on today’s NSI call.

The marked up AA doc is available here:
https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13424

Comments by Richard:
Most of the comments dealt with in a clear manner.

Only two points remain:

1. How does the OE know the path and hence the Auth servers in advance of path computation?

The assumption from John:

“It is my assumption that a user community like LHCONE would use one authorization system and anyone using, or providing resource as part of, would use the same system.” May be valid but it really limits the general use of the standard.

Somewhere in maybe section 7, or the intro, you need to have some lines outlining limitation/assumption and stating that the general case if for future study.

2. OAuth section seems to introduce new terminology.


Guy


Guy Roberts PhD
Senior Transport Network Architect
Tel: +44 (0)1223 371316
Mob: +44 (0)7881 336417
Skype: guy1965

GÉANT
Networks • Services • People
Learn more at www.geant.org<http://www.geant.org>​
​
GEANT Limited, trading as GÉANT. Registered in England & Wales. Registration Number 2806796. Registered Office – City House, 126-130 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ


_______________________________________________
nsi-wg mailing list
nsi-wg at ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg at ogf.org>
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg


_______________________________________________
nsi-wg mailing list
nsi-wg at ogf.org<mailto:nsi-wg at ogf.org>
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20160725/9896e20e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 73899 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20160725/9896e20e/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 104317 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20160725/9896e20e/attachment-0003.png>