[Nsi-wg] NML issues

[John MacAuley]

I thought Label is a single value, so they vlan range cannot be specified in there.  If it was a single port with one vlan then it might be viable, however, using a vlan range in the label file is semantically incorrect.

On 2013-09-23, at 11:04 AM, Hans Trompert <hans.trompert at surfnet.nl> wrote:

> The same goes for the unidirectional port declarations, some use Port and Label:
> 
>       <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2013:netherlight-out">
>         <nml:Label labeltype="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/ethernet#vlan">1780-1783</nml:Label>
>         <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/base#isAlias">
>           <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:nordu.net:1:in"/>
>         </nml:Relation>
>       </nml:Port>
> 
> While others use PortGroup and LabelGroup:
> 
>       <nml:PortGroup id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:nordu.net:1:out">
>         <nml:LabelGroup labeltype="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/ethernet#vlan">1779-1799</nml:LabelGroup>
>         <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/base#isAlias">
>           <nml:PortGroup id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2013:netherlight-in"/>
>         </nml:Relation>
>       </nml:PortGroup>
> 
> Can both ways be used?
> 
>     HansT.
> 
> On 9/23/13 4:46 PM, John MacAuley wrote:
>> Can someone explain to me which of the following two segments are correct?
>> 
>>         <nml:BidirectionalPort id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232">
>>             <nml:PortGroup id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232:in"/>
>>             <nml:PortGroup id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232:out"/>
>>         </nml:BidirectionalPort>
>> 
>> or
>> 
>>         <nml:BidirectionalPort id="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn">
>>             <nml:name>ndn</nml:name>
>>             <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn-in"/>
>>             <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn-out"/>
>>         </nml:BidirectionalPort>
>> 
>> Should Port or PortGroup be used?  We have a mix right now in our topologies.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nsi-wg mailing list
>> nsi-wg at ogf.org
>> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20130923/e8052fb5/attachment.html>