[Nsi-wg] NML issues

[Hans Trompert]

The same goes for the unidirectional port declarations, some use Port
and Label:

      <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2013:netherlight-out">
        <nml:Label
labeltype="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/ethernet#vlan">1780-1783</nml:Label>
        <nml:Relation
type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/base#isAlias">
          <nml:Port
id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:nordu.net:1:in"/>
        </nml:Relation>
      </nml:Port>

While others use PortGroup and LabelGroup:

      <nml:PortGroup
id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:nordu.net:1:out">
        <nml:LabelGroup
labeltype="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/ethernet#vlan">1779-1799</nml:LabelGroup>
        <nml:Relation
type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/base#isAlias">
          <nml:PortGroup
id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2013:netherlight-in"/>
        </nml:Relation>
      </nml:PortGroup>

Can both ways be used?

    HansT.

On 9/23/13 4:46 PM, John MacAuley wrote:
> Can someone explain to me which of the following two segments are
> correct?
>
>      
>   <nml:BidirectionalPortid="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232">
>            
> <nml:PortGroupid="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232:in"/>
>            
> <nml:PortGroupid="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232:out"/>
>         </nml:BidirectionalPort>
>
> or
>
>         <nml:BidirectionalPortid="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn">
>             <nml:name>ndn</nml:name>
>             <nml:Portid="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn-in"/>
>             <nml:Portid="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn-out"/>
>         </nml:BidirectionalPort>
>
> Should Port or PortGroup be used?  We have a mix right now in our
> topologies.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20130923/9740c0b9/attachment-0001.html>