[Nsi-wg] review of CS 2.0 documentation

[Hans Trompert]

Hi Guy,

I will forward your message to my developers Alan and Erik and I'm sure
they will be able to provide constructive feedback.

    HansT.

On 5/3/13 5:08 PM, Guy Roberts wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> Thanks for your offer to review the CS 2.0 specification.   As you are aware the CS v2.0 spec functions were fixed in our last meeting in Charlottesville and we are now documenting this functionality.
>
> In the past couple of weeks we have made some good progress on the documentation, but this is still a work in progress.  If you would like to see the latest version of the CS v2.0 draft please take a look here:
>
> https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf/nsi-wg?folder_id=6526
>
> A couple of things to note: Appendix A is incomplete in places, and we are making a small adjustment to the state machine (see the minutes of this week's NSI conf call for details).
>
> We welcome feedback on this document, however, please be aware that this is still subject to refinement in the way the information is presented; all suggestions for improvement are gratefully received.
>
> I am the editor of the document, so please send your marked-up edits to me and cc the list.  At this stage I would suggest focusing on the bigger picture... is the document clear? are there any missing section? etc.  We can focus on the finer details of wording and formatting later.
>
> Thanks,
> Guy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:nsi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Hans Trompert
> Sent: 03 May 2013 15:53
> To: nsi-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: [Nsi-wg] review of CS 2.0 documentation
>
> Hi,
>
> A little more than a month ago at SURFnet two developers started implementing the CS 2.0 specification. A lot of the logic can be deduced from the WSDLs, and John gave us an excellent presentation about CS 2.0 state machines and how things differs from 1.0. The slides John made have proven to be very useful while implementing but still leave a lot of questions on the detailed behavior open that only can be answered by proper documentation. I know that all of you are working very hard on creating this documentation and that's why I was thinking about how we can help. If you want we can review early versions of the documentation and give you feedback on that. Please let us know what you think.
>
> Cheers,
>     HansT.
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
>
>