[Nsi-wg] Keep those

Tomohiro Kudoh t.kudoh at aist.go.jp
Fri Sep 30 07:59:06 CDT 2011


Hi Henrik,

The state machine matrix follows the current design of state machine.
The "prov.rq" message sent at the Auto-provision state is for
children, to propagate the provision request. In the current design,
no prov.cf is returned to the requester at the time a prov.rq message
is received if it is before the start-time. The SM silently transits
to  "Auto provision" and then transits to "Provisioning" at the
start-time. It returns prov.cf or prov.fl when actual provisioning is
succeeded/failed at the start-time.

There is an argument on this matter as shown in:
http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=9&colspec=ID
Type Status Priority Owner FoundInVersion FixedInVersion Summary

The design may be changed after discussion. But at this moment, the SM
matrix is right.

Tomohiro

2011/9/30 Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at nordu.net>:
> Hi again
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:
>
>> Regarding the provisioning timeing, for example,
>>
>> start-time of this reservation was 19:51 after the hour.
>>
>> Provision request was received at 19:34 after the hour. So, it is
>> auto-provisioning.
>>
>> Therefore, following the current state machine specification, a provision
>> confirm is sent at the start-time, 19:51 after the hour.
>
> OK, I am a bit confused here.
>
> If I look at the state machine matrix, a provision request for a connection
> in reserved state should result in a transition to Auto-provision and emit a
> prov.rq message. AFAICT this is wrong.
>
> The question is if there should be no message emitted (i.e., wait till the
> start_time event occurs, but there is no message emitted for that either).
> Alternatively (and this is what I _think_ is correct) is that a prov.cf
> message should be emitted.
>
>
>    Best regards, Henrik
>
>  Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at ndgf.org>
>  NORDUnet / Nordic Data Grid Facility.
>


More information about the nsi-wg mailing list