[Nsi-wg] providerNSA and requesterNSA fields

[John MacAuley]

Okay, thanks.  I didn't heard that one.  I will update my code.

John.

On 2011-11-10, at 1:18 AM, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:

> Hi John,
> 
> The agreement at Lyon was, we will use urn:ogf:network:nsa: for NSA
> names and urn:ogf:network:nsnetwork: for physical network.
> 
> So the requester/providerNSA should be urn:ogf:network:nsa, and
> nsnetwork name is used for topology description and STP names.
> 
> This allows one to multiple relationship between NSA and network.
> 
> Tomohiro
> 
> 
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:23:40 -0500
> John MacAuley <john.macauley at surfnet.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Implementers,
>> 
>> For this demo are we using the nsnetwork URN as we did in Rio or are we using the nsa URN in these fields?  I need to know so I can makre sure my implementation is using the correct values.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> John.
>> _______________________________________________
>> nsi-wg mailing list
>> nsi-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
> 
>