[Nsi-wg] nsaAddress semantics

[John MacAuley]

Peoples,

There was a proposal to use the nsaAddress field to hold the protocol specific endpoint.  This would allow the removal of the "replyTo" field in the WSDL.  I originally had concerns about the lack of endpoint decoupling of the confirm and failed messages from the request endpoint, however, I am over the concern now and do not see a reasonable reason for an NSA to need this decoupling.

So if there are no concerns from the group, I would like to simplify things by removing the replyTo element and instead utilize the  nsaAddress element.

Comments?

John.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1791 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110509/8b08678b/attachment.bin