[Nsi-wg] Reservation request message

Inder Monga imonga at es.net
Wed Apr 6 08:47:07 CDT 2011


I would prefer URL/URI as well.

Inder

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	John MacAuley <mailto:john.macauley at surfnet.nl>
> April 6, 2011 12:55 PM
>
>
> So are you implying that the <nsaAddress> is element is not just an 
> opaque reference, but an actual protocol address?  Would this not 
> conflict with the requirement not to put any transport implementation 
> specific fields on the protocol?
>
> I have defined the <nsaAddress> element as an anyURI because I 
> anticipated you would be asking for this as soon as you saw my 
> example.  If you want to model the NSA address as a UDP port it can be 
> done with the URI format 
> <nsaAddress>udp://NSA.NORDU.net:2764</nsaAddress> or for TCP 
> <nsaAddress>tcp://NSA.NORDU.net:2764</nsaAddress> all accomplished 
> through the magic of the URI.
>
> These are still protocol specific so you might want to revert back to 
> my nice abstract name :-)
>
> As for not using STP in the <localId> of the STP... I am not sure 
> specifying a colon as an internal string separator is a good idea when 
> URI/URL are now becoming a de facto standard for naming resources. 
>  Some of the organizations that will participate in the NSI testbed 
> use this naming format already, and we should not force them to 
> change.  I also do not think we should be specifying a restricted 
> character set for naming in the NSI with so many standardized naming 
> schemes available in RFCs.
>
> Jerry... Come over to the dark side..
>
> Which raises another question.  Should naming support multi-byte 
> characters (UTF-8)?
>
> John.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Jerry Sobieski <mailto:jerry at nordu.net>
> March 26, 2011 12:15 PM
>
>
> Oh...a couple other comments I forgot:
>
> First, the <nsaAddresses> examples do not seem right...
> The message should reference a RA NSA and a PA NSA...  Those should 
> not need a domain reference...just the NSA identifier.    First, NSI 
> context has no notion of a "domain"...   but more importantly, we need 
> to specify where to find an NSA...it should ultimately resolve to an 
> IP address (v4 or v6) and a TCP port that NSA is listening to.   The 
> NSA location can be specified in a symbolic name manner, but it needs 
> to be specific to the transport layer it is using, and should not be 
> handled differently in the protocol for different transport layers.
>
> So an NSA locator string could be:  "NSA.NORDU.net:2764" meaning the 
> NSA is listening to port 2764 on the server nsa.nordu.net.    Or we 
> could do "urn:ogf:network:   netherlight.edu"  and assume it is using 
> a default port that is documented somewhere.
>
> We need to come to closure on NSA resolution.   I.e. How do we specify 
> an NSA location?   Is it an IP address and TCP port?  Is it a standard 
> DNS name?  a URN of some sort?
>
> Also, the string you referenced as a local part of the netherlight.edu 
> STP is probably not valid if we use the colon seperated tuple for NSI 
> endpoints.   Endpoints will be referenced outside of XML contexts.  
> And endpoint strings will be used in many other manners than simply 
> the local NRM.   Therefore, I think it is imperative that we make sure 
> the name strings are as simple as possible.  For instance is a network 
> name case sensitive?  Can it have colons ":" embedded in it?  Or will 
> that hose the tuple mechanism for naming?  Are spaces allowed?  are 
> linefeeds?  Are contiguous spaces significant?     I was hoping we 
> could let the local strings be whatever the local NSA wants them to 
> be, but I think we need to be a bit more specific about how we expect 
> to be able to use endpoint names.
>
> We need to specify some constraints on the string values that make up 
> NSI names.   I suggest case-insensitive, no spaces, alphanumeric, and 
> maybe a small set of special characters.
>
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	John MacAuley <mailto:john.macauley at surfnet.nl>
> March 24, 2011 11:37 AM
>
>
> Peoples,
>
> I have attached an XML file that contains an example reservation 
> request message. Ignore the namespace information and the 
> schemaLocation statement as these would not be included within the 
> SOAP message.
>
> John.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-- 
--
Inder Monga
imonga at es.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110406/51aec28d/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1517 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110406/51aec28d/attachment.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1418 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110406/51aec28d/attachment-0001.jpg 


More information about the nsi-wg mailing list