[Nsi-wg] Reservation request message
Inder Monga
imonga at es.net
Wed Apr 6 08:47:07 CDT 2011
I would prefer URL/URI as well.
Inder
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> John MacAuley <mailto:john.macauley at surfnet.nl>
> April 6, 2011 12:55 PM
>
>
> So are you implying that the <nsaAddress> is element is not just an
> opaque reference, but an actual protocol address? Would this not
> conflict with the requirement not to put any transport implementation
> specific fields on the protocol?
>
> I have defined the <nsaAddress> element as an anyURI because I
> anticipated you would be asking for this as soon as you saw my
> example. If you want to model the NSA address as a UDP port it can be
> done with the URI format
> <nsaAddress>udp://NSA.NORDU.net:2764</nsaAddress> or for TCP
> <nsaAddress>tcp://NSA.NORDU.net:2764</nsaAddress> all accomplished
> through the magic of the URI.
>
> These are still protocol specific so you might want to revert back to
> my nice abstract name :-)
>
> As for not using STP in the <localId> of the STP... I am not sure
> specifying a colon as an internal string separator is a good idea when
> URI/URL are now becoming a de facto standard for naming resources.
> Some of the organizations that will participate in the NSI testbed
> use this naming format already, and we should not force them to
> change. I also do not think we should be specifying a restricted
> character set for naming in the NSI with so many standardized naming
> schemes available in RFCs.
>
> Jerry... Come over to the dark side..
>
> Which raises another question. Should naming support multi-byte
> characters (UTF-8)?
>
> John.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Jerry Sobieski <mailto:jerry at nordu.net>
> March 26, 2011 12:15 PM
>
>
> Oh...a couple other comments I forgot:
>
> First, the <nsaAddresses> examples do not seem right...
> The message should reference a RA NSA and a PA NSA... Those should
> not need a domain reference...just the NSA identifier. First, NSI
> context has no notion of a "domain"... but more importantly, we need
> to specify where to find an NSA...it should ultimately resolve to an
> IP address (v4 or v6) and a TCP port that NSA is listening to. The
> NSA location can be specified in a symbolic name manner, but it needs
> to be specific to the transport layer it is using, and should not be
> handled differently in the protocol for different transport layers.
>
> So an NSA locator string could be: "NSA.NORDU.net:2764" meaning the
> NSA is listening to port 2764 on the server nsa.nordu.net. Or we
> could do "urn:ogf:network: netherlight.edu" and assume it is using
> a default port that is documented somewhere.
>
> We need to come to closure on NSA resolution. I.e. How do we specify
> an NSA location? Is it an IP address and TCP port? Is it a standard
> DNS name? a URN of some sort?
>
> Also, the string you referenced as a local part of the netherlight.edu
> STP is probably not valid if we use the colon seperated tuple for NSI
> endpoints. Endpoints will be referenced outside of XML contexts.
> And endpoint strings will be used in many other manners than simply
> the local NRM. Therefore, I think it is imperative that we make sure
> the name strings are as simple as possible. For instance is a network
> name case sensitive? Can it have colons ":" embedded in it? Or will
> that hose the tuple mechanism for naming? Are spaces allowed? are
> linefeeds? Are contiguous spaces significant? I was hoping we
> could let the local strings be whatever the local NSA wants them to
> be, but I think we need to be a bit more specific about how we expect
> to be able to use endpoint names.
>
> We need to specify some constraints on the string values that make up
> NSI names. I suggest case-insensitive, no spaces, alphanumeric, and
> maybe a small set of special characters.
>
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> John MacAuley <mailto:john.macauley at surfnet.nl>
> March 24, 2011 11:37 AM
>
>
> Peoples,
>
> I have attached an XML file that contains an example reservation
> request message. Ignore the namespace information and the
> schemaLocation statement as these would not be included within the
> SOAP message.
>
> John.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
--
--
Inder Monga
imonga at es.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110406/51aec28d/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1517 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110406/51aec28d/attachment.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1418 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20110406/51aec28d/attachment-0001.jpg
More information about the nsi-wg
mailing list