[Nml-wg] References

[Jeroen van der Ham]

Hi,

On 5 Oct 2012, at 14:48, Freek Dijkstra <freek.dijkstra at sara.nl> wrote:
> Jeroen's proposal: "If there are 2 network elements with the same id
> attribute in a given document, the union of the two elements should be
> considered the canonical definition of the element"
> 
> Aaron's Rule 1: If there are 2 network elements with the same id
> attribute in a given document, the behavior is undefined.

I think so.

Some questions for Aaron's approach:
- If you have a big database with measurements and topology information, would that mean you can only ever describe a network element once?
- How would you cope with updates and changes?

Jeroen.