[Nml-wg] Ordered lists (was: Teleconference Jan 12th)

[Jason Zurawski]

Freek/All;

ACK

-jason

On 1/12/12 10:29 AM, thus spake Freek Dijkstra:
> Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
>
>> - Freek will write up an example of overlapping ordered Groups to expose potential problems, also with regard to idRef XML notation.
>
> Attached is an example. I don't see big issues right away for this XML
> syntax. I think it is parseable, and is possible to find the correct
> order of the two lists, even if one of the items in the list occurs in
> both lists.
>
> I do see some issues when this is to be translated to RDF/OWL (for the
> record: I think that would require the introduction of some intermediate
> OWL resource objects to ensure that things point to the correct NML
> resource, perhaps both a "Ordered List" and a "Item" object are needed).
> However, I have not covered that. For now only XML is on the table. Is
> this syntax acceptable and clear? And above all, does it represent the
> consensus we build last year (I could not find an example with "next" in
> the nml-examples repository, and based this on the Salt Lake City
> consensus).
>
> Regards,
> Freek