[Nml-wg] id and name in Location
Jason Zurawski
zurawski at internet2.edu
Thu Aug 16 09:03:19 EDT 2012
carrier hotels are multi-story affairs, is the case that all things are located on the same floor, room, cage, 'altitude' :) ?
I would expect general location items (lat/long/city, etc.) to stay the same, but extensions to provide more detailed information could force people to use a different location element entirely so they can be precise.
In the end i don't really care, it can have id/name, but I don't predict reuse on a grand scale.
-jason
On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Jeroen van der Ham <vdham at uva.nl> wrote:
> I'm for solution 3 as well.
>
>
> On 16 Aug 2012, at 14:45, Jason Zurawski <zurawski at internet2.edu> wrote:
>
>> I would prefer 4 (not sure why locations need a name or id … is there really that much intended re-use?), but can live with 3.
>
> Yes there is much re-use, or at least other information that you want to attach to a Location object. And to do that, you need an id.
>
> Just for saying that a number of devices are in the same location it is easier to use an ID.
>
> To take a practical example, there are many different projects and owners who have hardware at StarLight. It makes things a lot easier if everyone can use an ID to refer to that location.
>
> Jeroen.
More information about the nml-wg
mailing list