[Nml-wg] Schema changes

[Jeff W.Boote]

I also vote A.

If we don't put the right 'building blocks' in from the beginning, I  
think we are in danger of not having the seamless upgrade path Chin  
mentioned. So it is important to me that we get the model for how  
different layers/technologies relate to each other. But, of course we  
are not defining those layers.

jeff

On Jun 3, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Martin Swany wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>> A) Should deliverable 2 contain the full abstract schema, including
>> adaptations, and deliverable 3 the application of the schema to
>> actual technologies?
>
> I vote A.  Just to reiterate, I think that we can construct the base
> schema without layer or technology specific information, but
> provide the basic building blocks for relating elements and
> describing the services they provide.  I also don't think that
> it is that difficult so I don't think it will set us back time-wise.
>
> best,
> martin
> _______________________________________________
> nml-wg mailing list
> nml-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg