[Nml-wg] Conference call

[Guy Roberts]

Freek,

I am able to join the call, perhaps we can discuss the G.805 G.800 issue which is of interest to NSI group?

Btw, You may be interested to hear that I am in the process of applying for DANTE membership for TMF. 

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Zurawski [mailto:zurawski at internet2.edu] 
Sent: 30 July 2009 14:36
To: Freek Dijkstra
Cc: Network Markup Language Working Group
Subject: Re: [Nml-wg] Conference call

Freek;

Speaking for some of the Internet2 participants, it would be in our best 
interest to postpone the call for at least a week.  We are under some 
fast approaching deadlines and would appreciate the delay.

Thanks;

-jason

> At the previous call we decided to have the next call today:
> 
> Starting Time: Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, US/Eastern
> Duration: 1:00
> 
> To join both the web and audio conference (recommended), click here:
> https://edial.internet2.edu/call/0186145
> If you only want to participate in the audio conference, you may dial in
> with the following numbers:
> Call: +1-734-615-7474 (PSTN CALL-OUT DOES NOT WORK) or +1-866-411-0013
> (toll free US/Canada Only)
> Enter access code: 0186145
> 
> 
> Jeroen and Chin reported that they are not able to attend. There have 
> been two items on the task list  (from Jeroen's mail July 10):
> 
>> Most important points:
>> - Next teleconference is on July 30th at the same time (16:00 european, 
>> 10:00 eastern).
>> - Martin will submit his work on defining the schema in text before the 
>> next teleconference.
>> - Freek will prepare some use-cases and examples on cross-connects and 
>> adaptations, so that we can get a sense of how the schema works.
> 
> I should be reprimanded for not have this ready earlier. I have a 
> half-baked attempt of a use case on my computer right now, and will sent 
> it later. I already did notice I'm missing the concept of
> 
> There are a few other items to discuss:
> - John Vollbrecht has recently looked in detail to G.800 for the NSI (I 
> am mostly familiar with G.805, a predecessort). If John attends I'm 
> curious to hear his opinion.
> - Recently I have been approached by another standardisation body that 
> did some work on our topic (they have a UML representation to describe 
> network topology and looked at hypergraphs). While academic institutes 
> are welcome to join for free, their standards are not available for 
> free. How do others feel about this? I did look at the OGF guidelines, 
> but it is not explicit.
> - Paola Grosso did a few (very) minor changes to deliverable #1 based on 
> comments (I promised this over a month ago, finally, she did - THANKS!). 
> I like to sent it to the OGF editor. Are people familiar with the 
> procedure (I'm not entirely).
> - Should be try to get urn:ogf: delegated from IANA and urn:ogf:network 
> delegated from the OGF? Is that a task for us to do?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Freek Dijkstra
_______________________________________________
nml-wg mailing list
nml-wg at ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg