[Nmc-wg] Multilayer E2Emon

[Roman Łapacz]

Hi Nina,

W dniu 2010-10-26 08:53, Nina Jeliazkova pisze:
>
>
> On 25 October 2010 22:02, Roman Łapacz <romradz at man.poznan.pl 
> <mailto:romradz at man.poznan.pl>> wrote:
>
>     W dniu 2010-10-25 13:22, Michael Bischoff pisze:
>     >
>     > - how to deal with multilayer E2E monitoring
>     > - Streaming? there was quite some interest in this before everyone
>     > went on vacation, not sure if it's a priority atm. (I expected more
>     > momentum within nmc)
>
>     I don't feel too good thinking that the topic of streaming is
>     untouched.
>     Recently I was collecting plans for future work in GN3 project and
>     Nina
>     declared to work on it with you.
>
>
> This is correct - I've declared I am interested in the topic, however 
> I am not sure if there are plans how exactly to proceed.

There is no detailed plan. We've got only a topic roughly defined and 
initial proposal made by Michael. Let's try together prepare such plan.

Roman

>
> Best regards,
> Nina
>
>     Cheers,
>     Roman
>
>     > - Others?
>     >
>     > With regards to multilayer E2E monitoring I'll leave that to the
>     > experts. As I recall as we asserted that the whole thing was quite
>     > non-trivial and full of pitfalls, I though the consensus was to
>     > incorporate/reuse an other spec. What do you want to nail down, sort
>     > out at OGF specifically Freek?
>     >
>     > Kind regards,
>     > Michael
>     >
>     > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Freek
>     Dijkstra<Freek.Dijkstra at sara.nl <mailto:Freek.Dijkstra at sara.nl>>
>      wrote:
>     >> Hi all,
>     >>
>     >> Would there be time at the OGF upcoming week to discuss how to
>     deal with
>     >> multilayer E2E monitoring?
>     >>
>     >> Basically, we have been trying to implement something like
>     that, but got
>     >> stuck, since the current XML was not going to work no matter
>     how we bend
>     >> it. Peter Tavenier (a colleague of mine) and I asked for
>     opinions on the
>     >> perfsonar-dev list, explaining our rational for doing this.
>     >>
>     >> See:
>     >>
>     https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/arc/perfsonar-dev/2010-09/msg00010.html
>     and
>     >> more mails in that thread.
>     >>
>     >> Frankly, the discussion that followed in our group at SARA
>     reminded me a
>     >> bit on discussion we had on the NML list 3 years ago, and I'm
>     not sure I
>     >> want to repeat that. Also I prefer to have a slightly faster time
>     >> progressing time. :~)
>     >>
>     >> So I was hoping to get some feedback how to proceed and if
>     other share
>     >> this interest.
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >> Freek
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Nmc-wg mailing list
>     >> Nmc-wg at ogf.org <mailto:Nmc-wg at ogf.org>
>     >> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>     >>
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Nmc-wg mailing list
>     > Nmc-wg at ogf.org <mailto:Nmc-wg at ogf.org>
>     > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Nmc-wg mailing list
>     Nmc-wg at ogf.org <mailto:Nmc-wg at ogf.org>
>     http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nmc-wg/attachments/20101026/090142ea/attachment-0001.html