[Nmc-wg] Multilayer E2Emon

[Nina Jeliazkova]

On 25 October 2010 22:02, Roman Łapacz <romradz at man.poznan.pl> wrote:

> W dniu 2010-10-25 13:22, Michael Bischoff pisze:
> > Hello all,
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > As I might actually make it there(28th), I might as well chime in.
> >
> > Afaik the following topics have recently been discussed and I would
> > expect them to be on the agenda:
> >
> > - Wrapping up(hopefully) result codes
> > - How to advertise capabilities (From last call)
> > - Overall progress
> >
> > Others would be:
> >
> > - how to deal with multilayer E2E monitoring
> > - Streaming? there was quite some interest in this before everyone
> > went on vacation, not sure if it's a priority atm. (I expected more
> > momentum within nmc)
>
> I don't feel too good thinking that the topic of streaming is untouched.
> Recently I was collecting plans for future work in GN3 project and Nina
> declared to work on it with you.
>
>
This is correct - I've declared I am interested in the topic, however I am
not sure if there are plans how exactly to proceed.

Best regards,
Nina


> Cheers,
> Roman
>
> > - Others?
> >
> > With regards to multilayer E2E monitoring I'll leave that to the
> > experts. As I recall as we asserted that the whole thing was quite
> > non-trivial and full of pitfalls, I though the consensus was to
> > incorporate/reuse an other spec. What do you want to nail down, sort
> > out at OGF specifically Freek?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Michael
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Freek Dijkstra<Freek.Dijkstra at sara.nl>
>  wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Would there be time at the OGF upcoming week to discuss how to deal with
> >> multilayer E2E monitoring?
> >>
> >> Basically, we have been trying to implement something like that, but got
> >> stuck, since the current XML was not going to work no matter how we bend
> >> it. Peter Tavenier (a colleague of mine) and I asked for opinions on the
> >> perfsonar-dev list, explaining our rational for doing this.
> >>
> >> See:
> >>
> https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/arc/perfsonar-dev/2010-09/msg00010.htmland
> >> more mails in that thread.
> >>
> >> Frankly, the discussion that followed in our group at SARA reminded me a
> >> bit on discussion we had on the NML list 3 years ago, and I'm not sure I
> >> want to repeat that. Also I prefer to have a slightly faster time
> >> progressing time. :~)
> >>
> >> So I was hoping to get some feedback how to proceed and if other share
> >> this interest.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Freek
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nmc-wg mailing list
> >> Nmc-wg at ogf.org
> >> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nmc-wg mailing list
> > Nmc-wg at ogf.org
> > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmc-wg mailing list
> Nmc-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nmc-wg/attachments/20101026/5409c8df/attachment.html