[Nmc-wg] pS Result Codes - proposal

[Jason Zurawski]

All;

On the call today we discussed the issue of result codes.  There were 2 
decissions:

  - The 2nd proposal for message structure (using namespaced datum 
elements) as proposed by Jeff/Martin in Munich is the way to go.

  - We need to see a mapping of the proposed result codes to what is 
currently used in pS-MDM and pS-PS services.  Roman and Slawek will 
start this for the MDM releases, Aaron will help with the PS.  Once we 
determine what is in use, we may prune down the list to items we need 
and anticipate needing in the near future.

Service/Client developers - your feedback is still needed but it may be 
prudent to wait until the next document version.

Thanks;

-jason

On 4/14/10 3:20 PM, Jeff W. Boote wrote:
> This looks good to me, and adequately represents what I saw as the
> general consensus in the Room in Munich.
>
> It would be especially important for those that were not in Munich to
> read/respond with their opinions. And, I'm going to call out client
> developers in particular. We need your feedback.
>
> thanks,
> jeff
>
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>
>> On 4/14/10 3:14 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>>> All;
>>>
>>> I have uploaded the updated proposal to the notes for this call:
>>>
>>> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.nmc-wg/wiki/20100415Notes
>>>
>>
>>
>> Please read the proposal ASAP, and be ready to discuss any additional
>> items that must be outlined in this document. The next step will be
>> brining this to the larger perfSONAR audience, and including it in the
>> nmc-base document.
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> -jason
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> any thoughts on this? Does the update follow what has been discussed in
>>>> Munich?
>>>>
>>>> Roman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, romradz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Updated proposal attached.
>>>>>
>>>>> Roman