[Nmc-wg] pS Result Codes - proposal

[Jeff W.Boote]

This looks good to me, and adequately represents what I saw as the  
general consensus in the Room in Munich.

It would be especially important for those that were not in Munich to  
read/respond with their opinions. And, I'm going to call out client  
developers in particular. We need your feedback.

thanks,
jeff

On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:

> On 4/14/10 3:14 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>> All;
>>
>> I have uploaded the updated proposal to the notes for this call:
>>
>> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.nmc-wg/wiki/20100415Notes
>
>
> Please read the proposal ASAP, and be ready to discuss any additional
> items that must be outlined in this document.  The next step will be
> brining this to the larger perfSONAR audience, and including it in the
> nmc-base document.
>
> Thanks;
>
> -jason
>
>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> any thoughts on this? Does the update follow what has been  
>>> discussed in
>>> Munich?
>>>
>>> Roman
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, romradz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Updated proposal attached.
>>>>
>>>> Roman
> _______________________________________________
> Nmc-wg mailing list
> Nmc-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg