[nm-wg] Next Phone Call
Leese, MJ (Mark)
m.j.leese at dl.ac.uk
Tue Mar 1 10:07:11 CST 2005
I suggest we reconvene on another number. We can try one here in the UK if the US folks don't mind paying ;-)
Dial-in info:
(Inside the U.K.) 0871 271 2900
(Outside the U.K.) +44 (0)870 050 6800
Enter the meeting code 255404 when asked.
U.K. users are charged at 8.51p per minute (plus VAT) per minute.
Non-U.K. users will be charged according to their local telecom providers.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-nm-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of dan
> gunter
> Sent: 01 March 2005 16:04
> To: nm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [nm-wg] Next Phone Call
>
>
> 1-800 number gets "number disconnected" message..
>
> Susan Evett wrote:
>
> > Eric Boyd wrote:
> >
> >> Next meeting is Tuesday, March 1 at 11 AM ET (the usual time).
> >>
> >> *Dial +1-734-531-0125 or +1-800-541-1710 and enter access
> code 0142286
> >>
> >> *Agenda TBD (basically recap from last meeting).
> >>
> >> --Eric
> >>
> >> Eric L. Boyd
> >> Manager, Performance Architecture & Technologies
> >> eboyd at internet2.edu
> >> 734-352-7032 (work)
> >> 734-834-6708 (cell)
> >>
> >> Internet2
> >> 1000 Oakbrook Drive, Suite 300
> >> Ann Arbor, MI 48104
> >>
> > ACTION ITEM:
> >
> > 1. Mark to incorporate a parameter list – based on the
> group agreement.
> > 2. Mark to draft a strawman proposal regarding the second
> > unresolved issue (packet types – required or
> optional?) and send
> > it to the list for comment.
> > 3. Mark to note that all elements of TimeInformation are
> > non-mandatory – based on the group agreement.
> > 4. Mark will include the option for specific parameters to be
> > marked as ‘required’ or ‘optional’.
> > 5. Richard will go to the standard body (i.e., NIST) to get an
> > international ‘standard’ for Mbps, Mb/s, etc.
> > 6. Mark to take nm_params units for numPackets out of
> the document.
> > 7. Brian and Dan will provide Eric and Susan with information ;
> > Internet2 will host the GGF NM-WG page. It will be redesigned
> > and vetted by the group. Brian will continue to host the page
> > until it is ready and then will create a redirect. Susan will
> > ensure that WG chairs (Richard, Eric, and Mark) have editing
> > authority to the page. (Page to be up before
> mid-March, next GGF).
> > 8. Group agreed that the final document will include all three
> > elements listed above.
> > 9. Group agreed to expand the schema to define the event types by
> > specifying what output would be produced (delay, rtt, raw ping
> > output).
> > 10. Martin to send the output and code from the tools that were
> > demoed to the list.
> > 11. Group agreed to reach consensus on delay.rtt, bw.achievable,
> > delay.oneWay, and link.utilization via the list.
> > 12. Martin will send Richard/Mark information on the
> > state-of-the-art at that point. Discussion to be held
> off-line.
> > 13. Richard (and co-chairs) will request the meeting at the GGF
> > Chicago meeting (June).
> > 14. Implementers of the schema should report back to the mailing
> > list on the reasons items were included/changed to document
> > problems.
> >
> > --Susan
>
>
>
More information about the nm-wg
mailing list