[nm-wg] Next Phone Call
dan gunter
dkgunter at lbl.gov
Tue Mar 1 10:04:23 CST 2005
1-800 number gets "number disconnected" message..
Susan Evett wrote:
> Eric Boyd wrote:
>
>> Next meeting is Tuesday, March 1 at 11 AM ET (the usual time).
>>
>> *Dial +1-734-531-0125 or +1-800-541-1710 and enter access code 0142286
>>
>> *Agenda TBD (basically recap from last meeting).
>>
>> --Eric
>>
>> Eric L. Boyd
>> Manager, Performance Architecture & Technologies
>> eboyd at internet2.edu
>> 734-352-7032 (work)
>> 734-834-6708 (cell)
>>
>> Internet2
>> 1000 Oakbrook Drive, Suite 300
>> Ann Arbor, MI 48104
>>
> ACTION ITEM:
>
> 1. Mark to incorporate a parameter list – based on the group agreement.
> 2. Mark to draft a strawman proposal regarding the second
> unresolved issue (packet types – required or optional?) and send
> it to the list for comment.
> 3. Mark to note that all elements of TimeInformation are
> non-mandatory – based on the group agreement.
> 4. Mark will include the option for specific parameters to be
> marked as ‘required’ or ‘optional’.
> 5. Richard will go to the standard body (i.e., NIST) to get an
> international ‘standard’ for Mbps, Mb/s, etc.
> 6. Mark to take nm_params units for numPackets out of the document.
> 7. Brian and Dan will provide Eric and Susan with information ;
> Internet2 will host the GGF NM-WG page. It will be redesigned
> and vetted by the group. Brian will continue to host the page
> until it is ready and then will create a redirect. Susan will
> ensure that WG chairs (Richard, Eric, and Mark) have editing
> authority to the page. (Page to be up before mid-March, next GGF).
> 8. Group agreed that the final document will include all three
> elements listed above.
> 9. Group agreed to expand the schema to define the event types by
> specifying what output would be produced (delay, rtt, raw ping
> output).
> 10. Martin to send the output and code from the tools that were
> demoed to the list.
> 11. Group agreed to reach consensus on delay.rtt, bw.achievable,
> delay.oneWay, and link.utilization via the list.
> 12. Martin will send Richard/Mark information on the
> state-of-the-art at that point. Discussion to be held off-line.
> 13. Richard (and co-chairs) will request the meeting at the GGF
> Chicago meeting (June).
> 14. Implementers of the schema should report back to the mailing
> list on the reasons items were included/changed to document
> problems.
>
> --Susan
More information about the nm-wg
mailing list