[jsdl-wg] Parameter Sweep new artefact
geoff
geoff.williams at comlab.ox.ac.uk
Thu Aug 21 07:46:46 CDT 2008
Hi,
Based on the explanation it sounds like the right thing to do as the
functionality remains unchanged, so I agree with Michel's proposal.
gef
p.s. The only insignificant beef that I have would be that it would be a
shame if the wg (and presumably others in a similar situation) appear
obliged to propose sub-optimal specs due to things being broken elsewhere.
Michel Drescher wrote:
> Folks,
>
> while reading the ParameterSweep spec draft 13, I came again to the
> definition of the sweep:DocumentNode definition.
>
> The DocumentNode is defined as of type xs:string containing a XPath
> 2.0 expression.
>
> This is the issue that I had numerous discussions with various people
> about. Despite having different reasons for why changing this, I agree
> with all of those people that it would be not wise to leave the
> definition of DocumentNode as it is without amending it.
>
> In short, XML tooling does not universally provide namespace bindings
> declared in the containing XML document ([XML Namespace] spec is in
> complete silence whether namespace bindings are in scope for XML
> *content*), or do not guarantee that namespace bindings are up to date
> to match the prefixes used in the XPath expression. That means that
> the XPath processor has no guarantee that it can resolve all prefixes
> used in the XPath expression can be resolved to the correct
> namespaces, or even to any namespace at all.
>
> The solution is to make the namespace bindings explicit that have been
> used to construct the XPath expression. That way, the ParameterSweep
> specification is independent of the tooling used by any implementer
> (which is a good thing :-).
>
> I therefore propose to amend the DocumentNode element with an
> attribute that makes the bindings explicit as follows:
>
> The attribute shall be named "mapping", and shall be defined as a
> mandatory anonymous XML attribute on the DocumentNode element.
>
> The attribute shall be of type "list of Strings" further constrained
> as follows:
> - It MUST have an even number of string parts.
> - The list MUST be formed as follows:
> Part 0: Namespace URI
> Part 1: Prefix for part 0
> Part n+2: Namespace URI
> Part n+3: Prefix for Part n+2
>
> The following is a brief example how the DocumentNode element would be
> used in a Sweep:
>
> <sweep:DocumentNode
> mapping="http://schemas.ggf.org/jsdl/2005/11/jsdl-posix foo http://schemas.ggf.org/jsdl/2005/11/jsdl-posix
> bar">
> //foo:POSIXApplication/bar:Argument[4]
> <sweep:DocumentNode>
>
> Note that the example is quite artificial as it binds the same
> namespace to two different prefixes. Nonetheless, it is a valid example.
>
> I will also add a tracker issue for this.
>
> Comments please?
>
> Cheers,
> Michel
>
> --
> Michel Drescher
> Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe, Ltd.
> Hayes Park Central
> Hayes End Road
> Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
> Reg. No. 4153469
>
> +44 20 8606 4834
> Michel.Drescher at uk.fujitsu.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> jsdl-wg mailing list
> jsdl-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsdl-wg
>
More information about the jsdl-wg
mailing list