JSDL 1.0 draft 25 re-submitted to GGF Editor (was Re: [jsdl-wg] Final call on JSDL 1.0)

[Andreas Savva]

Folks,

We've been made aware of a minor discrepancy in the jsdl schema which
we'd like to fix even at this late point. Briefly, the schema defines
extension attributes (xsd:anyAttribute) as processContents="lax" but not
the extension elements (xsd:any).

It should be made consistent and we think that both of these should be
processContents="lax". In conjunction with this schema change, for
consistency, we'll be changing a statement in Section 7, paragraph 2,
from  "MUST be supported" to "SHOULD be supported."

Please let me know if there is any problem with this change by end of
business Monday.

Andreas


Andreas Savva wrote:

>I have re-submitted JSDL 1.0 draft 25 to the GGF Editor.
>(Draft 24 fixed the link problem that Michel mentioned. Draft 25 has all
>changes accepted.)
>
>This draft will now go to a GFSG review and if approved will be
>published as a Proposed Recommendation. I will let you know how things
>progress.
>
>Thanks to all who contributed.
>Andreas
>  
>