[jsdl-wg] Issues for todays phone conference

[Darren Pulsipher]

Did I mess up the meeting today for the web or is the phone messed up?

Darren

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-jsdl-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-jsdl-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf Of Karl
Czajkowski
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:45 AM
To: Donal K. Fellows
Cc: JSDL WG
Subject: Re: [jsdl-wg] Issues for todays phone conference

Yes, staging is an interesting problem.  One approach would be to have
read/write/execute rights (implied or indicated) for stage-in files
and leave it to the consumer to know if posix identity of the job
process is important to implement these rights.

For GRAM, we perform the staging "as" the target execution user, so
we'd be covered with the current proposal, I think... :-)

karl


On Apr 12, Donal K. Fellows loaded a tape reading:
...
> The only concern about having the values inside the PosixApplication
> element type (or whatever the current name is) is how to ensure that the
> inward data-transfers ensure that they pick up the correct ownership
> information. I don't think we express the notion of whether a job wants
> to write to a staged-in file or not, which means we have to assume that
> it might... :-/
> 
> Donal.

-- 
Karl Czajkowski
karlcz at univa.com