[jsdl-wg] my view on execution user and group

[Andreas Savva]

Michel
I was partly objecting to the statement about 'purity' I guess. In any 
case it's good to know we agree.

Michel Drescher wrote:

> Andreas and others,
>
> On 4 Apr 2005, at 14:19, Andreas Savva wrote:
>
>> I don't see this as a purity issue. We put out of scope security 
>> saying that jsdl should be composed with some specialized language to 
>> describe those requirements. This is not the same as saying that jsdl 
>> should have no elements that might need such extra security 
>> assertions.  So I can ask for machine with name X but whether I am 
>> allowed to use it or not (and what I have to provide to be able to 
>> use it) is a different issue and is out of scope. But asking for the 
>> machine or resource by name is a resource request and is in scope.
>>
>> (And I do hope such in-scope / out-of-scope statements don't sound 
>> too arbitrary. :-)
>
>
> Hmm, somehow I thought I was stating the same. Anyway, the way you 
> stated it makes it much more clearer.
>
> Cheers,
> Michel
>