[jsdl-wg] my view on execution user and group
Michel Drescher
Michel.Drescher at uk.fujitsu.com
Mon Apr 4 08:22:22 CDT 2005
Andreas and others,
On 4 Apr 2005, at 14:19, Andreas Savva wrote:
> I don't see this as a purity issue. We put out of scope security
> saying that jsdl should be composed with some specialized language to
> describe those requirements. This is not the same as saying that jsdl
> should have no elements that might need such extra security
> assertions. So I can ask for machine with name X but whether I am
> allowed to use it or not (and what I have to provide to be able to use
> it) is a different issue and is out of scope. But asking for the
> machine or resource by name is a resource request and is in scope.
>
> (And I do hope such in-scope / out-of-scope statements don't sound too
> arbitrary. :-)
Hmm, somehow I thought I was stating the same. Anyway, the way you
stated it makes it much more clearer.
Cheers,
Michel
More information about the jsdl-wg
mailing list