[GGF-ipv6-wg] Infrastructure area meeting

[Cees de Laat]

At 11:32 AM +0200 6/23/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>I believe the answer is that we are done, unless Piers
>disagrees or anyone has the energy to update the
>dependency analysis.

that was also my understanding. I suppose that we need to keep this 
wg dormant in stead of completely removed and closed for in case new 
specs come up which need to be checked here.

See you,
Cees.

>     Brian
>
>P.S. I hope to be at Cees's infrastructure area meeting
>
>Tim Chown wrote:
>>Is there anything to be done on the IPv6 WG Charter, or are the WG's
>>activities completed?
>>
>>Tim
>>
>>On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:59:22PM +0200, Cees de Laat wrote:
>>
>>>Dear *,
>>>
>>>As you all most probably know the area's are going to be 
>>>restructured and the new area's will become effective at GGF 14.
>>>
>>>In the GFSG dance around which AD(s) takes/gets what area in the 
>>>new structure I was extremely pleased to get the Infrastructure 
>>>area, given that my professional interests are in Optical/photonic 
>>>networking, service/control planes and make that underware a first 
>>>class fit for the grid.
>>>
>>>You may be unaware but I have subscribed to your mailing lists in 
>>>februari and have tried to follow what is going on (on some I was 
>>>already subscribed).
>>>
>>>So I would like to have an area meeting which is scheduled for 
>>>wednesday june 29th 18h00-19h30. In that meeting we can discuss:
>>>- note taker(s)
>>>- agenda bashing
>>>- current status of the different groups
>>>   - current docs in production
>>>   - scope of the area
>>>- what is missing in the area, where do we need more or less activity
>>>- how do we effectively work together in the future (I hate to 
>>>impose useless phonecalls to your agenda's)
>>>
>>>The groups in this area are:
>>>ipv6-wg, nm-wg, datatransport-rg, ghpn-wg, nma-rg .
>>>I know that some groups may be dormant, or not meeting anymore, etc.
>>>I also want to remark that there are 2 BOF's running but not yet 
>>>converged to being chartered: Sensor grids and grid-VPN although 
>>>we actually may be close to finalizing that.
>>>
>>>Regarding the AD(s):
>>>I am currently the only AD for this area in the standards section. 
>>>My term is ending in october. I was on the GFSG for a little over 
>>>3.5 years by then. The NOMCOM is currently in the process of 
>>>getting these two positions (re)filled. If the NOMCOM chooses so I 
>>>may be serving again after October, I am currently a nominee.
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Cees.
>>>--
>>>http://www.science.uva.nl/~delaat/
>>>
>>>-------
>>>Via the GGF IPv6-WG mailing list
>>
>>
>
>-------
>Via the GGF IPv6-WG mailing list


-- 
http://www.science.uva.nl/~delaat/

-------
Via the GGF IPv6-WG mailing list