[GGF-ipv6-wg] Infrastructure area meeting
Brian E Carpenter
brc at zurich.ibm.com
Thu Jun 23 04:32:34 CDT 2005
I believe the answer is that we are done, unless Piers
disagrees or anyone has the energy to update the
dependency analysis.
Brian
P.S. I hope to be at Cees's infrastructure area meeting
Tim Chown wrote:
> Is there anything to be done on the IPv6 WG Charter, or are the WG's
> activities completed?
>
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:59:22PM +0200, Cees de Laat wrote:
>
>>Dear *,
>>
>>As you all most probably know the area's are going to be restructured
>>and the new area's will become effective at GGF 14.
>>
>>In the GFSG dance around which AD(s) takes/gets what area in the new
>>structure I was extremely pleased to get the Infrastructure area,
>>given that my professional interests are in Optical/photonic
>>networking, service/control planes and make that underware a first
>>class fit for the grid.
>>
>>You may be unaware but I have subscribed to your mailing lists in
>>februari and have tried to follow what is going on (on some I was
>>already subscribed).
>>
>>So I would like to have an area meeting which is scheduled for
>>wednesday june 29th 18h00-19h30. In that meeting we can discuss:
>>- note taker(s)
>>- agenda bashing
>>- current status of the different groups
>> - current docs in production
>> - scope of the area
>>- what is missing in the area, where do we need more or less activity
>>- how do we effectively work together in the future (I hate to impose
>>useless phonecalls to your agenda's)
>>
>>The groups in this area are:
>>ipv6-wg, nm-wg, datatransport-rg, ghpn-wg, nma-rg .
>>I know that some groups may be dormant, or not meeting anymore, etc.
>>I also want to remark that there are 2 BOF's running but not yet
>>converged to being chartered: Sensor grids and grid-VPN although we
>>actually may be close to finalizing that.
>>
>>Regarding the AD(s):
>>I am currently the only AD for this area in the standards section. My
>>term is ending in october. I was on the GFSG for a little over 3.5
>>years by then. The NOMCOM is currently in the process of getting
>>these two positions (re)filled. If the NOMCOM chooses so I may be
>>serving again after October, I am currently a nominee.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Cees.
>>--
>>http://www.science.uva.nl/~delaat/
>>
>>-------
>>Via the GGF IPv6-WG mailing list
>
>
-------
Via the GGF IPv6-WG mailing list
More information about the ipv6-wg
mailing list