[GGF-ipv6-wg] Final edits: [ggf-editor | Submit GGF Draft - 982] Survey of IPv4 Dependencies in Global Gri (fwd)
Piers O'Hanlon
P.OHanlon at cs.ucl.ac.uk
Thu Nov 25 04:57:55 CST 2004
Hi Rute (and all),
Firstly to let everyone know this document has finally passed through Public comment period and now has a few minor updates (see below) from the GGF Editors. Once these are made they have assured us it will be published.
Rute (and potentially others editors) - if you could make the updates to your document and then resubmit it that would be great.
Let me know if there are any problems.
Many thanks,
Piers O'Hanlon
--------------
GGF IPv6-WG CoChair
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: <sf-httpd at forge.gridforum.org>
Received: from vscan-b.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with UK SMTP
id <g.19074-0 at bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:34:57 +0000
Received: from sourceforge.ggf.org ([140.221.9.79] helo=forge.gridforum.org)
by vscan-b.ucl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CWJwW-0007dj-O0
for P.OHanlon at cs.ucl.ac.uk; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:33:44 +0000
Received: from sf-httpd by forge.gridforum.org
with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (SourceForge)) id 1CWKkm-0007JI-00
for <P.OHanlon at cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:25:40 -0600
To: P.OHanlon at cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: [ggf-editor | Submit GGF Draft - 982] Survey of IPv4 Dependencies in
Global Grid Forum Specifications
Reply-To: followup-982 at forge-tracker.gridforum.org
From: Sourceforge Tracker Monitor <noreply at forge.gridforum.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <E1CWKkm-0007JI-00 at forge.gridforum.org>
Sender: sf-httpd <sf-httpd at forge.gridforum.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:25:40 -0600
X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk,
helpdesk at ucl.ac.uk for more information
X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: sf-httpd at forge.gridforum.org
Greg Newby changed 982 on 2004-11-22 11:25:39
Status has changed: - New: 'Pending Info from Authors' Old: 'Final Editor Review'
Priority has changed: - New: '2' Old: '1'
Assigned To has changed: - New: 'Peter Clarke' Old: 'Greg Newby'
Resolution has changed: - New: 'Returned to Authors/Group' Old: '<None>'
Respond by visiting: https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=982&group_id=90 (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=982&group_id=90)
Summary: Survey of IPv4 Dependencies in Global Grid Forum Specifications
Project: EDITOR
Tracker: Submit GGF Draft
Artifact ID: 982
Category: Informational
Group: DATA
Status: Pending Info from Authors
Resolution: Returned to Authors/Group
Priority: 2
Last Modified By: Greg Newby
Last Modified: 2004-11-22 11:25:39
Submitted By: Piers O'Hanlon
Submit Date: * 2004-07-20 02:15:02
Assigned To: Peter Clarke
File(s): draft-ggf-ipv6-ipv4-dependencies-survey-00_3004-brian-14-7-04.doc
Description:
This IPv6 Working Group document has passed working group last call. It has been read by the ADs and a small number of other WG chairs.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Greg Newby (2004-11-22 11:25:39)
This document is ready to go. I'm making a few small recommendations, to accompany your "Guidelines" document (tracker 981). Please upload a final document when you're ready.
- - update the date in the header.
- - consider whether there are really 5 Authors (for the header), or whether there are just one or two Editors and the rest are contributors (for listing in a later section). It seems that sometimes people list everyone involved in a document as an Author, which is not ideal. An Author (or Editor) is someone who can vouch for the entire document, and is willing to engage in correspondence & upkeep for the forseeable future. If all 5 are authors, that's fine - but if not, consider listing just one or two editors, and moving the rest to a Contributor section.
- - 1.2 "GRID" - is this an acronym, or just Grid? (There is not yet a standard use of "Grid" versus "grid," but my view is that "Grid" currently means the (GGF) standards-compliant grid, and "grid" is generic).
- - please double-check that all acronyms are written fully on first use
- - 2.2.1: could you put an example of correct usage for http://example.com or similar? Ditto for 2.4.2.
- - Section 5: the 1st paragraph(s) before the table have some spacing or other issues. It's not clear whether this is three paragraphs missing extra lines in-between, or whether it's supposed to be one paragraph. Just a little formatting will fix this.
- - Section 6: See my comment about security considerations for tracker 981. Might the same apply here? Is there a risk from improper specification of use of IP versions?
- - References: add a blank line after each reference, or outdent each entry.
Go ahead and respond or update, and upload the final version. Thanks for your work on this!
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Greg Newby (2004-11-02 09:11:46)
gbn: Sent email to Piers O'Hanlon requesting his feedback on the effectiveness of public comment for this and associated document #981. Status changed to Awaiting Author Feedback.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Stacey Giannese (2004-09-28 12:43:06)
No comments have been made regarding this document so it will re-enter public comment period again.
Due date: 10-28-04.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Stacey Giannese (2004-08-13 07:46:53)
Document will now enter 30 day public comment period.
Due date: 9-13-04
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Charlie Catlett (2004-08-12 13:21:16)
This draft has completed the necessary steps prior to
being made available for public comment. Authors,
working group / research group chairs, and Area
Directors should encourage individuals to participate
in the public comment process and should announce
the public comment availability to appropriate
communities and groups.
Public comments can be viewed and submitted via
the GridForge Editor pages (see Forums) or:
http://www.ggf.org/documents
Public comments play an important part in the advancement
of a GGF draft and publication as a document in the
GGF document series.
An active public comment period strengthens the case
that the document is a useful and desired work product
for some community of consumers.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Stacey Giannese (2004-07-22 08:42:51)
This document has already been reviewed by an AD. It will now proceed to GFSG Review.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
View the Submit GGF Draft : https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?func=browse&group_id=90&atid=414 (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?func=browse&group_id=90&atid=414)
________________________________________
Modify your monitoring preferences: https://forge.gridforum.org/monitoring/monitorPreference.php (https://forge.gridforum.org/monitoring/monitorPreference.php)
Turn off monitoring for this Tracker: https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?group_id=90&atid=414&aid=982&func=monitor (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?group_id=90&atid=414&aid=982&func=monitor)
------- End of Forwarded Message
-------
Via the GGF IPv6-WG mailing list
More information about the ipv6-wg
mailing list