[INFOD-WG] Faults

Dieter Gawlick dieter.gawlick at oracle.com
Mon Apr 2 12:07:31 CDT 2007


I agree with Ronny - Dieter


Ronny Fehling wrote:
> you are right.
> We are treating the responses inconsistent.
> Even though you might not leave a call-back ERP, I assume that the 
> response handling should be part of the request-response message no 
> matter what the protocol is.
> So I think we should put MUST in every response.
>
> Comments?
> R
>
> Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
>   
>> Ronny,
>>
>> But as we have it the registry does not even have to try to explain why
>> it has ignored a message!
>>
>> Are you also saying the mechanism to return a fault is quite different
>> from that to return a success message to the extent that it may not be
>> possible to send a faulyt but always possible to send a success message?
>>
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ronny Fehling [mailto:ronny.fehling at oracle.com] 
>>> Sent: 02 April 2007 15:52
>>> To: Fisher, SM (Steve)
>>> Cc: infod-wg at ggf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [INFOD-WG] Faults
>>>
>>> I think we had put this in because we do not require the 
>>> calling service to have a call-back number
>>>
>>> Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Chapter 2 says in each response section:
>>>>
>>>> "If the INFOD registry accepts ... MUST ...
>>>> Instead ... MAY send the following faults ..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't we want to say:
>>>>
>>>> "If the INFOD registry accepts ... MUST ...
>>>> otherwise ... MUST send one of the following faults ..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course we cannot guarantee succesful transmission of the fault - 
>>>> but nor can we be sure that the happy response wil get though.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>> --
>>>>   infod-wg mailing list
>>>>   infod-wg at ogf.org
>>>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/infod-wg
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>         
> --
>   infod-wg mailing list
>   infod-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/infod-wg
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/infod-wg/attachments/20070402/78cc6448/attachment.html 


More information about the infod-wg mailing list