[INFOD-WG] Faults

[Ronny Fehling]

I think we had put this in because we do not require the calling service 
to have a call-back number

Fisher, SM (Steve) wrote:
> Chapter 2 says in each response section:
>
> "If the INFOD registry accepts ... MUST ...
> Instead ... MAY send the following faults ..."
>
>
> Don't we want to say:
>
> "If the INFOD registry accepts ... MUST ...
> otherwise ... MUST send one of the following faults ..."
>
>
> Of course we cannot guarantee succesful transmission of the fault - but
> nor can we be sure that the happy response wil get though.
>
> Steve
> --
>   infod-wg mailing list
>   infod-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/infod-wg
>