[infod-wg] Action action 134 - hiding implmentation specific details in in XML

[Dieter Gawlick]

I forgot two mention vocabularies:

    * Data vocabularies: wsinfod.data._vocabularies
    * Property vocabularies: wsinfod.property_vocabularies

Dieter

Dieter Gawlick wrote:
> XML already has a mechanism to hide implementation specifics.
>
> fn.doc ('MyINFODRegsitry.xml') represents the collection of all 
> elements in */my /*INFOD registry.
>
> To get the collection of publishers we need to specify:
>
> fn.doc ('MyINFODRegsitry.xml')//wsinfod.publishers - this assumes that 
> wsinfod.publishers is the name of the vocabulary used to specify 
> publishers.
>
> Generally we would get the collection of instances related to a 
> vocabulary by specifying
>
> fn.doc ('MyINFODRegsitry.xml')///vocabulary_name
>
> /
> I will update the use case document accordingly; unless advised 
> otherwise I will use the following name for the INFOD vocabulary:
>
>     * Publishers: wsinfod.publishers
>     * Consumers: wsinfod.consumers
>     * Subscribers: wsinfod.subscribers
>     * Subscriptions: wsinfod:subscriptions
>     * Association: wsinfod.associations
>
>
> I will look into the question of the substitution group by tomorrow.
>
> Dieter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/infod-wg/attachments/20060522/34f55546/attachment.html