[infod-wg] Actions updated

Steve Fisher S.M.Fisher at rl.ac.uk
Sun Jan 22 11:20:40 CST 2006


On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:31:12AM -0800, Shailendra Mishra wrote:
> Hi Steve:
> 
> Dieter was asking me about the unresolved publish issue yesterday. In my 
> understanding, I thought we had resolved the publish issue as follows:
>    - If the message binding is soap, we don't need a publish interface.
>    - For any other binding, we should specify an explicity publisher 
> interface.
> Please let me know, if you disagree. - Shailendra

Shailendra,

I definitely disagree. The interface is defined by the WSDL. Do you
mean an API to help construct the messages? If so I still
disagree. Can you explain how the need for an interface is in any way
related to the binding?

Steve

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Fisher" <S.M.Fisher at rl.ac.uk>
> To: <infod-wg at ggf.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:38 AM
> Subject: [infod-wg] Actions updated
> 
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >INFOD-Current-Actions.txt and INFOD-Closed-Actions.txt have been
> >updated following yesterday's meeting.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> 





More information about the infod-wg mailing list