[Idel-wg] [voms-proc-wg] OGF37 Arrangements and sessions

[Yoshio Tanaka]

Hi Mike, Jens, and all,

I'm planning to go to OGF37, but I need to leave there on Wednesday
(13th).  So, if we have CAOPs session(s), I would expect that it will
be on Monday or Tuesday.

--
Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka at aist.go.jp)

From: Jens Jensen <jens.jensen at stfc.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [voms-proc-wg] [Idel-wg] OGF37 Arrangements and sessions
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:01:19 +0000
Message-ID: <50FC06BF.9030700 at stfc.ac.uk>

> Hi Mike,
> 
> There is more afoot for OGF37; Andrew Grimshaw is planning to organise
> a specific workshop on (identity) delegation. He was going to write
> some paragraphs and send them around - probably around now.  It would
> make sense to combine IDEL-WG with this activity (ie to host it as an
> extended IDEL-WG) - if you agree.
> 
> 1. I haven't looked into the timing/flights/costs/logistics yet, so I
> don't know.
> 2. A day would seem reasonable (four sessions)?
> 3. Don't know; will leave to the chairs to decide. There is useful
> stuff to do, though, we have enough material for at least one session
> - a draft IGTF profile for SARoNGS et al (aka "LIVE"), updates from
> PMAs,
> 3. As regards FEDSEC I suspect there is more than enough useful new
> stuff floating around, but it'll depend on who is coming and to some
> extent how many documents I have time to put into a useful form before
> March...
> 
> Cheers
> -j
> 
> On 18/01/2013 17:01, Mike Jones wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > It's time to register sessions of OGF37.
> >
> > There's noise from IDEL participants and we should schedule that this
> > group
> > meets.  And I should be in a position to circulate a strawman on the
> > gridsite
> > delegation info doc real soon^(TM).
> >
> > CA-ops mentioned that OGF37 was scheduled close to another similar
> > meeting and
> > folk might not be able to make it; I believe we should at least meet
> > for one
> > session to keep things ticking forward, but am happy to apply for more
> > than 1
> > session if we thing there are items to discuss.  If we will not be
> > quorate
> > then perhaps we should not have CA-ops
> >
> > VOMS proc has a straw-man doc that we need to work on so we need to
> > schedule
> > this session.
> >
> > Questions then:
> >
> > 1, Who will make it to OGF37
> > 2, do we need 3 or 4 sessions to cover work (assuming CA-OPS)?
> > 3, do we suspend CA-ops this time due to participation?
> > also,
> > 3, Jens Are you going, and is there a FedSec session?
> >
> > Rgds,
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Idel-wg mailing list
> > Idel-wg at ogf.org
> > https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/idel-wg
> 
> 
> -- 
> Scanned by iCritical.