[gsa-rg] Update

[Philipp Wieder]

Hi Ramin,

Ramin Yahyapour wrote:
>>> As the GFSG requested a quick response on these things, I already
>>> made some minor updates to the milestones.
>> Sorry, I seem to have something misunderstood. I thought that the milestones imply some 
>> changes to the charter and I have seen the task manager as a tool to define and follow
>> different tasks. I did not recognise that the milestones are a category at the task manager.
>> I think that I therefore have to make another task category which will hold tasks like 65
>> and 66 which are not milestones itself. Does this sound reasonable.
> 
> There are several things to distinguish:
> The point is that it is tried to get a global view on the GGF
> roadmap in terms of standards and documents.
> Currently, it is very difficult to see what is in the works
> right now and what milestones are upcoming.
> The request by Joel Repogle to group chairs was mainly to fill a
> new kind of milestone/group database. The global picture of GGF activities.
> This does not necessarily imply to change anything to the current
> roadmap of groups.
> However, this is obviously a very good occasion to update
> the actual group roadmap.
Yes, I think so, too.

> The tasks in GridForge are a tool to keep track of our
> activities. Here, we can have an arbitrary number of items
> to facilitate our group work. However, major activities and milestones
> should be "tasks" in GridForge too. That is at least my understanding.
Mine too (at least after checking the usage if the task tool at other 
groups). Therefore I suggest to have a task category "General" where we 
keep track of actions we promise at telecons or f2fs. What do you think?

> Did this clarify anything?
Everything.

Best regards, Philipp.

> Ramin