[GRAAP-WG] Time Constraints Profile

[Sebastian Hudert]

Hi Dominic and all,

I am not completely sure about this, but doesn't the XML Schema
Specification already define data types for recurring points in time
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes); see for example
"time" or "gMonthDay".

Couldn't we build on this?
 
Best regards,
Sebastian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: graap-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces at ogf.org] Im Auftrag
von Dominic Battre
Gesendet: Montag, 7. Dezember 2009 14:39
An: Constantinos (Costas) Kotsokalis
Cc: GRAAP-WG
Betreff: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Time Constraints Profile

Hello Costas,

it would certainly be a possible extension.

The question is do we want it? If we end up translating ical to XML we 
come to a specification that is extremely powerful but very difficult to 
implement.

Our idea was to use the simplest language that would be useful. 
Therefore, I would like to ask you and the others: Do you need something 
like "every day, 9am-5pm"?

Best regards,

Dominic

Constantinos (Costas) Kotsokalis wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
> 
> Would you see fit to augment this also with some construct for defining 
> periodic durations? E.g. to be able to say "every day, 9am-5pm", or 
> things like that.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  Costas
> 
> 
> On 7 Dec 2009, at 13:43, Dominic Battre wrote:
> 
>> Dear GRAAP members,
>>
>> we have seen in various discussions that there seems to be a frequent
>> desire for a standardized term language to express when a service shall
>> be delivered.
>>
>> Examples are:
>>
>> - Making a hardware reservation of a cluster for interactive use
>>
>> - Co-allocation of resources of various types (hardware, network,
>> licenses, ...)
>>
>> - Defining a deadline for the completion of a job
>>
>> We have had a discussion about this in Banff after which Oliver and I
>> have prepared a proposal for a Time Constraints Profile for
>> WS-Agreement. This proposal has been uploaded here:
>>
>> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15832?nav=1
>>
>> We would be eager to hear your comments.
>>
>> - Is the proposal clear?
>>
>> - Is the proposal complete?
>>
>> - Does the proposal satisfy your needs?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dominic
>> -- 
>>  graap-wg mailing list
>>  graap-wg at ogf.org
>>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
> 
> 

--
  graap-wg mailing list
  graap-wg at ogf.org
  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg