[graap-wg] Minutes from Oct. 26 telecon

Jim Pruyne jim_pruyne at hp.com
Wed Oct 26 11:38:21 CDT 2005



Stephen M Pickles wrote:

>All,
>
>1.) In case it helps Toshi to complete his action,
>I've attached a word document containing the comments I
>posted to the WS-Agreement public comment tracker,
>and I've indicated the items that _I_ think might require 
>discussion.
>
>  
>
Thanks, Stephen.  I also cut-and-pasted the comments into a top-level 
response in the public comment tracker.

>2.) In what timezone(s) will the meetings be one hour
>earlier? I ask because in today's telcon of GGF compute area
>chairs (which started at the same time as the GRAAP telcon),
>we thought it would be a good idea in future to hold the compute
>area telcon (which will be held on the last Wednesday of each
>month) half an hour earlier to avoid clashing with the GRAAP
>telcon. So if we do that, will we just be ensuring that we
>clash again next month?
>
>  
>
It will be one hour earlier in the US, and this is due to the daylight 
savings time change here.  It will be the same time relative to GMT.

--- Jim

>Best wishes,
>
>Stephen
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg at ggf.org] 
>>On Behalf Of Jim Pruyne
>>Sent: 26 October 2005 16:39
>>To: GRAAP-WG
>>Subject: [graap-wg] Minutes from Oct. 26 telecon
>>
>>          Minutes from October 26 '05 Telecon
>>
>>Attendees
>>---------
>>
>>Jim Pruyne
>>Toshi Nakata
>>Heiko Ludwig
>>Asit Dan
>>
>>Discussion
>>----------
>>
>>- Let's move the meeting time one hour earlier because of daylight
>>  savings time in the US and EU.  We'll do that starting next week.
>>
>>- The URL for the public comments has been sent out.
>>
>>- Toshi to group the large comment list from Stephen Pickles into the
>>  grammar ones vs. the ones that require discussion.
>>
>>- Managing the responses could be handled a little more formally, so
>>  we should be more clear on exactly what to be posted in a reply on
>>  the public comment tracker.
>>
>>- There was some concern at GGF that people could not tell how we were
>>  making decisions.  Heiko proposes that we make our process clear in
>>  an e-mail to the mailing list.  Jim will do this.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>





More information about the graap-wg mailing list