[graap-wg] proposal: stateful async agreement

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Hi karl thank you very much for your suggestion.
Just to clarify..

May I understand that

AgreementAcceptance portType is on the Agreement Initiator side and not 
on the Agreement Provider side?

Best Regards
Toshi


>  E. An optional AgreementAcceptance portType is introduced with two 
>     operations: acceptAgreement and rejectAgreement.
>
>     1. Both operations accept an empty input, as the association with
>        an agreement is implicit via the WSRF addressing model.
>
>     2. An optional fault might be useful on rejectAgreement input to
>        communicate why the offer was rejected?
>
>     3. These operations are only meaningful when the
>        AgreementAcceptance service is in a Pending state. The
>        operations synchronously change the service state to Observed
>        or Rejected, respectively.
>
>     4. The AgreementAcceptance and Agreement portTypes may be merged
>        to form a single service interface, and the state is shared
>        between them. (What is the right way to do this in WSDL?
>        Provide portType combinations in specification?)
>  
>

-- 
We have moved to a new Office!!
Toshiyuki Nakata ?????
Internet System Laboratories NEC 
t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210)
Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)