[graap-wg] Telecon on 3/21

Jon MacLaren maclaren at cct.lsu.edu
Mon Mar 21 19:07:24 CST 2005


On Mar 21, 2005, at 5:44 PM, Karl Czajkowski wrote:
>
>> I think that such a document would be very valuable at this point.  It
>> could also be a valuable input to the BES group, to show you their
>> intent - I didn't pick up on your viewpoint from your presentation in
>> Seoul, and I think I was pretty awake at that point (you were lucky
>> :-).
>>
>
> Really??  I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone...
>
> I thought I said explicitly that WS-Agreement is a generalization of
> the GRAM pattern for "creating a job" and could use JSDL instead of
> our GRAM job language. I then added that this had to be weighed
> against their milestones to decide whether to do it or take a more
> traditional approach, and gave due warning about the difficulty of
> rendering either type of interface on a short schedule, i.e. the devil
> is in the details, and the traditional approach is not necessarily the
> conservative approach since it can lead to repetition of mistakes.

Fair enough - I expect that I was wrong about my state of awakeness.  
(This leads me to wonder what WG sessions I *was* awake for...)

I still like the idea of an information document, though.

Cheers,

Jon.





More information about the graap-wg mailing list